Literature DB >> 15055502

Barriers for early return-to-work of workers with musculoskeletal disorders according to occupational health physicians and human resource managers.

M van Duijn1, H Miedema, L Elders, A Burdorf.   

Abstract

Recent studies have indicated positive effects of modified work for workers with musculosceletal complaints. The question remains how effectively modified work can be implemented in companies. This study describes barriers for introducing modified work for workers on sickness absence due to musculoskeletal complaints. Modified work was defined as gradually increasing the physical demands at work until the worker is ready for full duty in his regular job. In order to describe barriers in implementation of modified work, a model based on health education was used, consisting of six successive stages. A questionnaire derived from this model was sent to human resource managers of different companies and their occupational health physicians. The internal consistency was estimated with the Cronbach's alpha. The results showed a large number of barriers for modified work. According to 52% of the company management and 54% of the occupational health physicians evident barriers were found due to lack of knowledge on modified work and negative attitudes of the employees. Both companies and physicians reported a barrier in the possibilities to change the work tasks (45-54%) or the organization of the work (45-38%). About 62% of the companies reported barriers due to a mismatch between the education of the sick worker and the specific requirements of modified work. Despite the assumed positive effects of modified work, the implementation process is hampered by a large number of barriers. A maximum effort from all parties involved is required for a successful rehabilitation process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15055502     DOI: 10.1023/b:joor.0000015009.00933.16

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Rehabil        ISSN: 1053-0487


  16 in total

Review 1.  Clinical guidelines: using clinical guidelines.

Authors:  G Feder; M Eccles; R Grol; C Griffiths; J Grimshaw
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-03-13

2.  [Acute low back pain: activity, NSAID's and muscle relaxants effective; bedrest and targeted exercise not effective; results of systematic reviews].

Authors:  M W van Tulder; B W Koes; W J Assendelft; L M Bouter; J Daams; J R van der Laan
Journal:  Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd       Date:  2000-07-29

3.  Improving the physician role in evaluating work ability and managing disability: a survey of primary care practitioners.

Authors:  G Pransky; J N Katz; K Benjamin; J Himmelstein
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2002-11-10       Impact factor: 3.033

4.  The treatment of acute low back pain--bed rest, exercises, or ordinary activity?

Authors:  A Malmivaara; U Häkkinen; T Aro; M L Heinrichs; L Koskenniemi; E Kuosma; S Lappi; R Paloheimo; C Servo; V Vaaranen
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1995-02-09       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 5.  Positive and negative evidence of risk factors for back disorders.

Authors:  A Burdorf; G Sorock
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 5.024

6.  A randomized controlled trial of two strategies to implement active sick leave for patients with low back pain.

Authors:  Inger B Scheel; Kåre Birger Hagen; Jeph Herrin; Andrew D Oxman
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-03-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Implementation of a participatory ergonomics program in the rehabilitation of workers suffering from subacute back pain.

Authors:  P Loisel; L Gosselin; P Durand; J Lemaire; S Poitras; L Abenhaim
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.661

8.  Rehabilitation of home care workers: supportive factors and obstacles prior to disability pension due to musculoskeletal disorders.

Authors:  Lotta Dellve; Monica Lagerström; Mats Hagberg
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2002-06

Review 9.  Return to work after sickness absence due to back disorders--a systematic review on intervention strategies.

Authors:  L A Elders; A J van der Beek; A Burdorf
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.015

10.  Return to work after occupational injury. Family physicians' perspectives on soft-tissue injuries.

Authors:  Jaime Guzman; Annalee Yassi; Juliette E Cooper; Jawad Khokhar
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.275

View more
  11 in total

1.  What happens to work if you're unwell? Beliefs and attitudes of managers and employees with musculoskeletal pain in a public sector setting.

Authors:  Gwenllian Wynne-Jones; Rhiannon Buck; Carol Porteous; Lucy Cooper; Lori A Button; Chris J Main; Ceri J Phillips
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2011-03

Review 2.  Epidemiology of work related neck and upper limb problems: psychosocial and personal risk factors (part I) and effective interventions from a bio behavioural perspective (part II).

Authors:  P M Bongers; S Ijmker; S van den Heuvel; B M Blatter
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2006-09

3.  Does the knowledge-to-action (KTA) framework facilitate physical demands analysis development for firefighter injury management and return-to-work planning?

Authors:  Kathryn Sinden; Joy C MacDermid
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2014-03

4.  The Job Accommodation Scale (JAS): psychometric evaluation of a new measure of employer support for temporary job modifications.

Authors:  William S Shaw; Vicki L Kristman; Kelly Williams-Whitt; Sophie Soklaridis; Yueng-Hsiang Huang; Pierre Côté; Patrick Loisel
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2014-12

Review 5.  Integrating psychosocial and behavioral interventions to achieve optimal rehabilitation outcomes.

Authors:  Michael Jl Sullivan; Michael Feuerstein; Robert Gatchel; Steven J Linton; Glenn Pransky
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2005-12

6.  Return to work expectation predicts work in chronic musculoskeletal and behavioral health disorders: prospective study with clinical implications.

Authors:  Bodil Heijbel; Malin Josephson; Irene Jensen; Stefan Stark; Eva Vingård
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2006-06

7.  Implementing a pilot work injury management program in Hong Kong.

Authors:  Hon-Sun Lai; Chetwyn C H Chan
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2007-10-30

8.  Consequences of musculoskeletal disorders on occupational events: a life-long perspective from a national survey.

Authors:  Annette Leclerc; Pauline Pascal; Jean-François Chastang; Alexis Descatha
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2014-06

9.  Work resumption at the price of distrust: a qualitative study on return to work legislation in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Nicole Hoefsmit; Angelique de Rijk; Inge Houkes
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Occupational Physicians' Reasoning about Recommending Early Return to Work with Work Modifications.

Authors:  Ritva Horppu; Kari-Pekka Martimo; Eira Viikari-Juntura; Tea Lallukka; Ellen MacEachen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.