Literature DB >> 15055435

In vitro comparison of shaping abilities of ProTaper and GT rotary files.

Mario Veltri1, Aniello Mollo, Pier Paolo Pini, Luca Fernando Ghelli, Piero Balleri.   

Abstract

This study analyzed the abilities of ProTaper and GT Rotary files to shape the curved canals of extracted mandibular molars. Twenty mesial canals with curvatures ranging from 23 to 54 degrees (Weine analysis) were radiographically selected from a group of 58 molars. The specimens, divided into two groups, were instrumented using the two systems according to the manufacturer's guidelines. Using a radiographic platform and a contrast medium, reproducible preinstrumentation and postinstrumentation radiographs were taken. A computer analysis allowed magnification and superimposition of the images to measure the preparation asymmetry and the linear amount of dentin removal at five points along the canals and to detect canal aberrations. Instrument failures, working time, and working length changes were recorded. The dentin removal and the mean asymmetry showed no significant differences between the two systems. Neither aberrations nor significant changes in working length resulted, but two instruments separated in each group. Working time was shorter for ProTaper files (p < 0.05).

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15055435     DOI: 10.1097/00004770-200403000-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endod        ISSN: 0099-2399            Impact factor:   4.171


  9 in total

1.  Canal-centering ability: An endodontic challenge.

Authors:  Deivanayagam Kandaswamy; Nagendrababu Venkateshbabu; Ilango Porkodi; Gali Pradeep
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2009-01

2.  Comparison of two canal preparation techniques using mtwo rotary instruments.

Authors:  Faeze Hamze; Kiamars Honardar; Kiumars Nazarimoghadam
Journal:  Iran Endod J       Date:  2011-11-15

3.  Effect of Patency File on Transportation and Curve Straightening in Canal Preparation with ProTaper System.

Authors:  Seyed Mohsen Hasheminia; Nastaran Farhadi; Ali Shokraneh
Journal:  ISRN Dent       Date:  2013-09-12

4.  Cone-beam computed tomography for evaluation of apical transportation in root canals prepared by two rotary systems.

Authors:  Zahra Sadat Madani; Azam Haddadi; Sina Haghanifar; Ali Bijani
Journal:  Iran Endod J       Date:  2014-03-08

5.  Comparison of Canal Preparation Pattern of K3 and ProTaper Rotary Files in Curved Resin Blocks.

Authors:  Nahid Mohammadzade Akhlaghi; Zohreh Khalilak; Ladan Baradaran Mohajeri; Mahshid Sheikholeslami; Saeed Saedi
Journal:  Iran Endod J       Date:  2008-04-02

6.  Assessment of canal walls after biomechanical preparation of root canals instrumented with Protaper Universal rotary system.

Authors:  Carlos Menezes Aguiar; Daniela de Andrade Mendes; Andréa Cruz Câmara; Antonio Poli de Figueiredo
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2009 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.698

7.  In Vitro Comparison of Apically Extruded Debris during Root Canal Preparation of Mandibular Premolars with Manual and Rotary Instruments.

Authors:  Sonal Soi; Suman Yadav; Sumeet Sharma; Mohit Sharma
Journal:  J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects       Date:  2015-09-16

8.  An Ex Vivo Evaluation of Antimicrobial Efficacy of Root Canal Preparation With Hand K-Files, Hand Pro Taper, and Pro Taper Rotary Files.

Authors:  Shabna Moyin; Sameer Punathil; Manoj Kumar Pulyodan; Shamsheer Thayil; Akshay Mohan; Dhanya Valsan
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2019-05

9.  The failures of root canal preparation with hand ProTaper.

Authors:  Marilena Bătăiosu; Oana Diaconu; Iren Moraru; C Dăguci; Mihaela Tuculină; Luminiţa Dăguci; Lelia Gheorghiţă
Journal:  Curr Health Sci J       Date:  2012-09-19
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.