Literature DB >> 15054859

Exclusion of repetitive DNA elements from gnathostome Hox clusters.

Claudia Fried1, Sonja J Prohaska, Peter F Stadler.   

Abstract

Despite their homology and analogous function, the Hox gene clusters of vertebrates and invertebrates are subject to different constraints on their structural organization. This is demonstrated by a drastically different distribution of repetitive DNA elements in the Hox cluster regions. While gnathostomes have a strong tendency to exclude repetitive DNA elements from the inside of their Hox clusters, no such trend can be detected in the Hox gene clusters of protostomes. Repeats "invade" the gnathostome Hox clusters from the 5' and 3' ends while the core of the clusters remains virtually free of repetitive DNA. This invasion appears to be correlated with relaxed constraints associated with gene loss after cluster duplications. Copyright 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15054859     DOI: 10.1002/jez.b.20007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol        ISSN: 1552-5007            Impact factor:   2.656


  14 in total

1.  Molecular evolution of duplicated ray finned fish HoxA clusters: increased synonymous substitution rate and asymmetrical co-divergence of coding and non-coding sequences.

Authors:  Günter P Wagner; Kazuhiko Takahashi; Vincent Lynch; Sonja J Prohaska; Claudia Fried; Peter F Stadler; Chris Amemiya
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.395

2.  Atypical relaxation of structural constraints in Hox gene clusters of the green anole lizard.

Authors:  Nicolas Di-Poï; Juan I Montoya-Burgos; Denis Duboule
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2009-02-18       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  Accumulation of transposable elements in Hox gene clusters during adaptive radiation of Anolis lizards.

Authors:  Nathalie Feiner
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Shark genomes provide insights into elasmobranch evolution and the origin of vertebrates.

Authors:  Yuichiro Hara; Kazuaki Yamaguchi; Koh Onimaru; Mitsutaka Kadota; Mitsumasa Koyanagi; Sean D Keeley; Kaori Tatsumi; Kaori Tanaka; Fumio Motone; Yuka Kageyama; Ryo Nozu; Noritaka Adachi; Osamu Nishimura; Reiko Nakagawa; Chiharu Tanegashima; Itsuki Kiyatake; Rui Matsumoto; Kiyomi Murakumo; Kiyonori Nishida; Akihisa Terakita; Shigeru Kuratani; Keiichi Sato; Susumu Hyodo; Shigehiro Kuraku
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-10-08       Impact factor: 15.460

5.  Complete HOX cluster characterization of the coelacanth provides further evidence for slow evolution of its genome.

Authors:  Chris T Amemiya; Thomas P Powers; Sonja J Prohaska; Jane Grimwood; Jeremy Schmutz; Mark Dickson; Tsutomu Miyake; Michael A Schoenborn; Richard M Myers; Francis H Ruddle; Peter F Stadler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-02-05       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Comparative analyses of vertebrate posterior HoxD clusters reveal atypical cluster architecture in the caecilian Typhlonectes natans.

Authors:  An Mannaert; Chris T Amemiya; Franky Bossuyt
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 3.969

7.  Identification and characterisation of five novel miniature inverted-repeat transposable elements (MITEs) in amphioxus (Branchiostoma floridae).

Authors:  P W Osborne; G N Luke; P W H Holland; D E K Ferrier
Journal:  Int J Biol Sci       Date:  2006-04-10       Impact factor: 6.580

8.  Comparative genomics of chondrichthyan Hoxa clusters.

Authors:  John F Mulley; Ying-Fu Zhong; Peter Wh Holland
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2009-09-02       Impact factor: 3.260

9.  Analysis of the Tribolium homeotic complex: insights into mechanisms constraining insect Hox clusters.

Authors:  Teresa D Shippy; Matthew Ronshaugen; Jessica Cande; Jianping He; Richard W Beeman; Michael Levine; Susan J Brown; Robin E Denell
Journal:  Dev Genes Evol       Date:  2008-04-08       Impact factor: 0.900

10.  Phylogenomic analyses of KCNA gene clusters in vertebrates: why do gene clusters stay intact?

Authors:  Simone Hoegg; Axel Meyer
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2007-08-15       Impact factor: 3.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.