Literature DB >> 15054370

Radiofrequency ablation versus electrocautery in tonsillectomy.

Daniel J Hall1, Philip D Littlefield, Deborah P Birkmire-Peters, Michael R Holtel.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to compare the safety, difficulty of removal, and postoperative pain profile of radiofrequency ablation versus standard electrocautery removal of tonsils. STUDY DESIGN AND
SETTING: A prospective, blinded study was designed to remove 1 tonsil with each of the 2 methods. Time of operation, estimated blood loss, difficulty of operation, postoperative pain, rate of postoperative hemorrhage, and the patient's preferred technique were evaluated.
RESULTS: The operating time was significantly longer (P < 0.007) and the patients reported significantly less pain (P < 0.001) with radiofrequency ablation. There were no differences in blood loss, difficulty of operation, or postoperative hemorrhage rates. The patients preferred the radiofrequency ablation technique (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Radiofrequency ablation is a viable method to remove tonsillar tissue. Operating time for this procedure will likely decrease with experience. There was significantly less pain reported with radiofrequency ablation compared with standard electrocautery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15054370     DOI: 10.1016/j.otohns.2003.09.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0194-5998            Impact factor:   3.497


  12 in total

1.  A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Study of Coblation versus Dissection Tonsillectomy in Adult Patients.

Authors:  Singh Rakesh; T S Anand; Garg Payal; Kulshreshtha Pranjal
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2011-11-30

Review 2.  [Coblation tonsillectomy: a review of the literature].

Authors:  J P Windfuhr
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  Is the systemic inflammatory reaction to surgery responsible for post-operative pain after tonsillectomy, and is it "technique-related"?

Authors:  Zeljka Roje; Goran Racic; Goran Kardum; Mirnes Selimovic
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2011-07-11       Impact factor: 1.704

Review 4.  Coblation versus other surgical techniques for tonsillectomy.

Authors:  Melissa Pynnonen; Jennifer V Brinkmeier; Marc C Thorne; Lee Yee Chong; Martin J Burton
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-08-22

5.  Coblation Versus Conventional Tonsillectomy: A Double Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Mostafa El-Taher; Zaki Aref
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-08-30

6.  Coblation of suprastomal granulomas in tracheostomy-dependent children.

Authors:  C Scott Brown; Marisa A Ryan; Vaibhav H Ramprasad; Anatoli F Karas; Eileen M Raynor
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 1.675

Review 7.  [An update on tonsillotomy studies].

Authors:  J P Windfuhr; K Savva
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.284

8.  Clinical practice guideline: tonsillitis II. Surgical management.

Authors:  Jochen P Windfuhr; Nicole Toepfner; Gregor Steffen; Frank Waldfahrer; Reinhard Berner
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 9.  Tonsillotomy: facts and fiction.

Authors:  J P Windfuhr; K Savva; J D Dahm; J A Werner
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 10.  Hemorrhage rate after coblation tonsillectomy: a meta-analysis of published trials.

Authors:  Ralph Mösges; Martin Hellmich; Silke Allekotte; Kerstin Albrecht; Myriam Böhm
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-03-04       Impact factor: 2.503

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.