Stephanie J Weinstein1, Tara M Vogt, Shirley A Gerrior. 1. Nutritional Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Insititue, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The Healthy Eating Index (HEI) is a summary measure of dietary quality, based on a 100-point scale. Our objectives were to assess the HEI as a measure of dietary status through its correlation with nutritional biomarkers and to identify those biomarkers most associated with diet quality and healthful food intake patterns. DESIGN: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) III, 1988-94. SUBJECTS: Adults (> or =17 years) with calculated HEI scores and blood nutrient data (n=16,467). STATISTICAL ANALYSES PERFORMED: Weighted crude and partial Pearson correlation coefficients (r) between HEI scores and blood nutrients were calculated. Geometric mean blood nutrient concentrations were calculated for five HEI score categories (ranging from < or =50 to >80). RESULTS: HEI score was positively correlated with serum (r=0.25) and red blood cell (r=0.27) folate, serum vitamins C (r=0.30) and E (r=0.21), and all serum carotenoids except lycopene (r=0.17 to 0.27). These blood nutrient concentrations were 21% to 175% higher for participants in the highest HEI score group (>80) compared with those in the lowest group (< or =50). Mean HEI scores were significantly (P<.0001) greater among the 42% of participants who took dietary supplements. Most correlations were attenuated when adjusted for additional factors. CONCLUSIONS: HEI score is correlated with a wide range of blood nutrients; the strongest relationships are with biomarkers of fruit and vegetable intake. These results are an important step in the validation of the HEI, emphasizing its potential as a tool for nutrition and health studies.
OBJECTIVES: The Healthy Eating Index (HEI) is a summary measure of dietary quality, based on a 100-point scale. Our objectives were to assess the HEI as a measure of dietary status through its correlation with nutritional biomarkers and to identify those biomarkers most associated with diet quality and healthful food intake patterns. DESIGN: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) III, 1988-94. SUBJECTS: Adults (> or =17 years) with calculated HEI scores and blood nutrient data (n=16,467). STATISTICAL ANALYSES PERFORMED: Weighted crude and partial Pearson correlation coefficients (r) between HEI scores and blood nutrients were calculated. Geometric mean blood nutrient concentrations were calculated for five HEI score categories (ranging from < or =50 to >80). RESULTS: HEI score was positively correlated with serum (r=0.25) and red blood cell (r=0.27) folate, serum vitamins C (r=0.30) and E (r=0.21), and all serum carotenoids except lycopene (r=0.17 to 0.27). These blood nutrient concentrations were 21% to 175% higher for participants in the highest HEI score group (>80) compared with those in the lowest group (< or =50). Mean HEI scores were significantly (P<.0001) greater among the 42% of participants who took dietary supplements. Most correlations were attenuated when adjusted for additional factors. CONCLUSIONS: HEI score is correlated with a wide range of blood nutrients; the strongest relationships are with biomarkers of fruit and vegetable intake. These results are an important step in the validation of the HEI, emphasizing its potential as a tool for nutrition and health studies.
Authors: Valisa E Hedrick; Brenda M Davy; Grace A Wilburn; A Hope Jahren; Jamie M Zoellner Journal: Public Health Nutr Date: 2015-04-23 Impact factor: 4.022
Authors: Cherie Guillermo; Carol J Boushey; Adrian A Franke; Kristine R Monroe; Unhee Lim; Lynne R Wilkens; Loïc Le Marchand; Gertraud Maskarinec Journal: J Am Coll Nutr Date: 2019-07-10 Impact factor: 3.169
Authors: M L Da Costa Louzada; P Chagas Durgante; R J De Marchi; F Neves Hugo; J Balbinot Hilgert; D M Pereira Padilha; M Terezinha Antunes Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2012-01 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: Ana C Ricardo; Magdalena Madero; Wei Yang; Cheryl Anderson; Matthew Menezes; Michael J Fischer; Mary Turyk; Martha L Daviglus; James P Lash Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2013-03-21 Impact factor: 8.237