Literature DB >> 15054015

Assessing the long-term effects of the Safe Dates program and a booster in preventing and reducing adolescent dating violence victimization and perpetration.

Vangie A Foshee1, Karl E Bauman, Susan T Ennett, G Fletcher Linder, Thad Benefield, Chirayath Suchindran.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study determined 4-year postintervention effects of Safe Dates on dating violence, booster effects, and moderators of the program effects.
METHODS: We gathered baseline data in 10 schools that were randomly allocated to a treatment condition. We collected follow-up data 1 month after the program and then yearly thereafter for 4 years. Between the 2- and 3-year follow-ups, a randomly selected half of treatment adolescents received a booster.
RESULTS: Compared with controls, adolescents receiving Safe Dates reported significantly less physical, serious physical, and sexual dating violence perpetration and victimization 4 years after the program. The booster did not improve the effectiveness of Safe Dates.
CONCLUSIONS: Safe Dates shows promise for preventing dating violence but the booster should not be used.

Mesh：

Year:  2004        PMID： 15054015      PMCID： PMC1448308          DOI： 10.2105/ajph.94.4.619

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN： 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  28 in total

1.  Randomized trial of brief family interventions for general populations: adolescent substance use outcomes 4 years following baseline.

Authors:  R L Spoth; C Redmond; C Shin
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2001-08

2.  Partner violence among adolescents in opposite-sex romantic relationships: findings from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health.

Authors:  C T Halpern; S G Oslak; M L Young; S L Martin; L L Kupper
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Gender and contextual factors in adolescent dating violence.

Authors:  C Molidor; R M Tolman
Journal:  Violence Against Women       Date:  1998-04

4.  Rethinking estrangement, interventions, and intimate femicide.

Authors:  D Ellis; W S Dekeseredy
Journal:  Violence Against Women       Date:  1997-12

5.  Drug prevention in junior high: a multi-site longitudinal test.

Authors:  P L Ellickson; R M Bell
Journal:  Science       Date:  1990-03-16       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Five- and six-year follow-up results from four seventh-grade smoking prevention strategies.

Authors:  D M Murray; P Pirie; R V Leupker; U Pallonen
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  1989-04

7.  Six-year follow-up of the first Waterloo school smoking prevention trial.

Authors:  B R Flay; D Koepke; S J Thomson; S Santi; J A Best; K S Brown
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  A cognitive-behavioral approach to substance abuse prevention: one-year follow-up.

Authors:  G J Botvin; E Baker; A D Filazzola; E M Botvin
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.913

9.  Essential elements of school-based smoking prevention programs.

Authors:  T J Glynn
Journal:  J Sch Health       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 2.118

10.  The effects of scheduling format and booster sessions on a broad-spectrum psychosocial approach to smoking prevention.

Authors:  G J Botvin; N L Renick; E Baker
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  1983-12
View more
  79 in total

1.  Looking ahead toward community-level strategies to prevent sexual violence.

Authors:  Sarah DeGue; Melissa K Holt; Greta M Massetti; Jennifer L Matjasko; Andra Teten Tharp; Linda Anne Valle
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 2.681

Review 2.  Dating matters™: the next generation of teen dating violence prevention.

Authors:  Andra Teten Tharp
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2012-08

3.  Dating Violence Prevention Programming: Directions for Future Interventions.

Authors:  Ryan C Shorey; Heather Zucosky; Hope Brasfield; Jeniimarie Febres; Tara L Cornelius; Chelsea Sage; Gregory L Stuart
Journal:  Aggress Violent Behav       Date:  2012-03-21

4.  Assessing the effects of the dating violence prevention program "safe dates" using random coefficient regression modeling.

Authors:  Vangie A Foshee; Karl E Bauman; Susan T Ennett; Chirayath Suchindran; Thad Benefield; G Fletcher Linder
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2005-09

5.  Connecting the Dots: State Health Department Approaches to Addressing Shared Risk and Protective Factors Across Multiple Forms of Violence.

Authors:  Natalie Wilkins; Lindsey Myers; Tomei Kuehl; Alice Bauman; Marci Hertz
Journal:  J Public Health Manag Pract       Date:  2018 Jan/Feb

6.  Prevalence of dating violence among sexual minority youth: variation across gender, sexual minority identity and gender of sexual partners.

Authors:  Alexa Martin-Storey
Journal:  J Youth Adolesc       Date:  2014-01-10

7.  Speak Up! Prosocial Intervention Verbalizations Predict Successful Bystander Intervention for a Laboratory Analogue of Sexual Aggression.

Authors:  Dominic J Parrott; Kevin M Swartout; Andra Teten Tharp; Danielle M Purvis; Volkan Topalli
Journal:  Sex Abuse       Date:  2019-01-09

8.  Risk for coerced sex among female youth in Ghana: roles of family context, school enrollment and relationship experience.

Authors:  Jeffrey B Bingenheimer; Elizabeth Reed
Journal:  Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2014-12

9.  Impacting sexism through social justice prevention: implications at the person and environmental levels.

Authors:  Jonathan P Schwartz; Lori D Lindley
Journal:  J Prim Prev       Date:  2008-12-03

10.  Adolescents Who Self-Harm and Commit Violent Crime: Testing Early-Life Predictors of Dual Harm in a Longitudinal Cohort Study.

Authors:  Leah S Richmond-Rakerd; Avshalom Caspi; Louise Arseneault; Jessie R Baldwin; Andrea Danese; Renate M Houts; Timothy Matthews; Jasmin Wertz; Terrie E Moffitt
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2019-01-04       Impact factor: 18.112
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.