Literature DB >> 15053558

Evaluation of Bt (Bacillus thuringiensis) corn on mouse testicular development by dual parameter flow cytometry.

Denise G Brake1, Robert Thaler, Donald P Evenson.   

Abstract

The health safety of Bt (Bacillus thuringiensis) corn (Zea mays L.) was studied using mouse testes as a sensitive biomonitor of potential toxic effects. Pregnant mice were fed a Bt corn or a nontransgenic (conventional) diet during gestation and lactation. After they were weaned, young male mice were maintained on the respective diets. At 8, 16, 26, 32, 63, and 87 days after birth, three male mice and an adult reference mouse were killed, the testes were surgically removed, and the percentage of germ cell populations was measured by flow cytometry. Multigenerational studies were conducted in the same manner. There were no apparent differences in percentages of testicular cell populations (haploid, diploid, and tetraploid) between the mice fed the Bt corn diet and those fed the conventional diet. Because of the high rate of cell proliferation and extensive differentiation that makes testicular germ cells highly susceptible to some toxic agents, it was concluded that the Bt corn diet had no measurable or observable effect on fetal, postnatal, pubertal, or adult testicular development. If data from this study were extrapolated to humans, Bt corn is not harmful to human reproductive development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15053558     DOI: 10.1021/jf0347362

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Agric Food Chem        ISSN: 0021-8561            Impact factor:   5.279


  6 in total

1.  How safe does transgenic food need to be?

Authors:  Laura DeFrancesco
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 54.908

2.  Bt-maize (MON810) and non-GM soybean meal in diets for Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) juveniles--impact on survival, growth performance, development, digestive function, and transcriptional expression of intestinal immune and stress responses.

Authors:  Jinni Gu; Anne Marie Bakke; Elin C Valen; Ingrid Lein; Åshild Krogdahl
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  How subchronic and chronic health effects can be neglected for GMOs, pesticides or chemicals.

Authors:  Gilles-Eric Séralini; Joël Spiroux de Vendômois; Dominique Cellier; Charles Sultan; Marcello Buiatti; Lou Gallagher; Michael Antoniou; Krishna R Dronamraju
Journal:  Int J Biol Sci       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 6.580

4.  A 90-day dietary toxicity study of genetically modified rice T1C-1 expressing Cry1C protein in Sprague Dawley rats.

Authors:  Xueming Tang; Fangting Han; Kai Zhao; Yan Xu; Xiao Wu; Jinbin Wang; Lingxi Jiang; Wei Shi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  The use of whole food animal studies in the safety assessment of genetically modified crops: limitations and recommendations.

Authors:  Andrew Bartholomaeus; Wayne Parrott; Genevieve Bondy; Kate Walker
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 5.635

6.  GMOs in animal agriculture: time to consider both costs and benefits in regulatory evaluations.

Authors:  Alison L Van Eenennaam
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2013-09-25
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.