| Literature DB >> 15053546 |
Violaine Athès1, Marcial Peña y Lillo, Clémence Bernard, Ricardo Pérez-Correa, Isabelle Souchon.
Abstract
Several experimental methodologies exist for measuring volatilities; however, results show great dispersion and sometimes lack of agreement between different methods. The aim of our study was to compare the performance of three static headspace methods (vapor phase calibration, VPC; phase ratio variation, PRV; and liquid calibration static headspace, LC-SH) for determining gas/liquid partition coefficients of two aroma compounds in hydroalcoholic multicomponent solutions at infinite dilution. Comparison with literature data based on static and dynamic methods showed that PRV is simpler than VPC and LC-SH and that VPC and PRV are more accurate than LC-SH, which presented a significant bias (50% lower values).Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2004 PMID: 15053546 DOI: 10.1021/jf0350257
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Agric Food Chem ISSN: 0021-8561 Impact factor: 5.279