Literature DB >> 15053364

Comparison of reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction, virus isolation, and immunoperoxidase assays for detecting pigs infected with low, moderate, and high virulent strains of classical swine fever virus.

Kathy Handel1, Helen Kehler, Kevin Hills, John Pasick.   

Abstract

Pigs were experimentally inoculated with Glentorf, Lelystad/97, and Alfort/187: representative low, moderate, and high virulent strains of classical swine fever virus (CSFV). Animals were tested for viremia using virus isolation and reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assays run under routine diagnostic conditions. The virus was detected in the peripheral blood by virus isolation and RT-PCR assays of all Glentorf- and Lelystad/97-infected pigs beginning at 3 days postinoculation (dpi) and in all Alfort/187-infected pigs beginning at 2 dpi. Viremia, as determined by virus isolation, remained detectable in Lelystad/97- and Alfort/187-infected pigs until the last animal within each cohort was euthanized on days 12 and 7 postinoculation, respectively. In contrast, the virus could be isolated from the blood of all Glentorf-infected pigs between 3 and 7 dpi but not from 10 to 21 dpi when the experiment was concluded. Viremia, as determined by RT-PCR, became apparent in Alfort/187-infected pigs at 2 dpi and in Glentorf- and Lelystad/97-infected pigs at 3 dpi. All pigs, regardless of the CSFV strain used, remained RT-PCR positive until they were euthanized. Tonsils were harvested from all the pigs and frozen sections tested for the presence of the CSFV antigen using polyclonal pestivirus and monoclonal CSFV horseradish peroxidase (HRPO) conjugates. Immunostaining reactions were positive for all the Alfort/187- and Lelystad/97-infected pigs. By contrast, tonsils from the Glentorf-infected pigs gave negative to equivocal results. These data suggest that an RT-PCR assay performed on blood may be the best test when dealing with pigs infected with low virulent strains of CSFV.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15053364     DOI: 10.1177/104063870401600207

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vet Diagn Invest        ISSN: 1040-6387            Impact factor:   1.279


  5 in total

1.  Molecular typing and phylogenetic analysis of classical swine fever virus isolates from Kerala, India.

Authors:  Nimisha Bhaskar; Chintu Ravishankar; R Rajasekhar; K Sumod; T G Sumithra; Koshy John; M Mini; Reghu Ravindran; Shiju Shaji; J Aishwarya
Journal:  Virusdisease       Date:  2015-08-30

2.  Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay based on a chimeric antigen bearing antigenic regions of structural proteins Erns and E2 for serodiagnosis of classical swine fever virus infection.

Authors:  Min Lin; Erin Trottier; Maria Mallory
Journal:  Clin Diagn Lab Immunol       Date:  2005-07

3.  Clustering of classical swine fever virus isolates by codon pair bias.

Authors:  Immanuel Leifer; Dirk Hoeper; Sandra Blome; Martin Beer; Nicolas Ruggli
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2011-11-29

4.  Insulated Isothermal Reverse Transcriptase PCR (iiRT-PCR) for Rapid and Sensitive Detection of Classical Swine Fever Virus.

Authors:  O Lung; J Pasick; M Fisher; C Buchanan; A Erickson; A Ambagala
Journal:  Transbound Emerg Dis       Date:  2015-01-27       Impact factor: 5.005

5.  Rapid pre-clinical detection of classical swine fever by reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification.

Authors:  Hao-tai Chen; Jie Zhang; Li-na Ma; Yan-ping Ma; Yao-zhong Ding; Xiang-tao Liu; Lei Chen; Li-qing Ma; Yong-guang Zhang; Yong-sheng Liu
Journal:  Mol Cell Probes       Date:  2008-12-13       Impact factor: 2.365

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.