Literature DB >> 15053345

Quality and safety evaluation of genetically modified potatoes spunta with Cry V gene: compositional analysis, determination of some toxins, antinutrients compounds and feeding study in rats.

Rafaat El Sanhoty1, Ahamed Ali Abd El-Rahman, Klaus Werner Bögl.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the composition, nutritional and toxicology safety of GM potato Spunta lines compared to that of conventional potato Spunta. Compositional analyses were conducted to measure the proximate chemical composition with references to 14 components, total solid, protein, lipid, crude fibre, ash, carbohydrate, starch, reducing sugar, nonreducing sugar, sodium, calcium, potassium, phosphorus, and ascorbic acid. Some toxins and anti-nutrients compounds were determined. Feeding study of GM potatoes line (G2 and G3) in rats were done for 30 days. Four groups of albino rats were used for studying the effect and the safety assessment of GM potatoes Spunta G2 and G3. Group (I) was fed on control basal diet, group (II) was fed on control diet plus 30% freeze-dried nongenetically modified potato Spunta, group (III) was fed on control diet plus 30% freeze-dried genetically modified potato Spunta, and group (IV) was fed on control diet plus 30% freeze-dried genetically modified potato Spunta GMO G3. There were no significant differences between GM potatoes G2, G3, and Spunta control potato line in the proximate chemical composition. The levels of glycoalkaloids in transgenic potato tubers and nontransgenic were determined and there were also no significant differences between the GM potatoes and conventional potato line, the levels were in agreement with a safety level recommended by FAO/WHO (200 mg/ kg) for acute toxicity. Protease inhibitor activity and total phenol were estimated and no significant differences between the GM potatoes line and conventional potato Spunta line were found. During the period tested, rats in each group (I, II, III, IV) grew well without marked differences in appearance. No statistical difference were found in food intake, daily body weight gain and feed efficiency. But there is a slightly significant difference in finally body weight between the control group and experimental groups. No significant difference were found in serum biochemical value between each groups, and also between relative organs weight (liver, spleen, heart, kidney, testes). From these results, it can be concluded that the GM potatoes Spunta line (G2 and G3) with Cry V gene are confirmed to have nearly the composition and biochemical characteristics as non-GM potato Spunta.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15053345     DOI: 10.1002/food.200300310

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nahrung        ISSN: 0027-769X


  8 in total

1.  A 90-day subchronic feeding study of genetically modified rice expressing Cry1Ab protein in Sprague-Dawley rats.

Authors:  Huan Song; Xiaoyun He; Shiying Zou; Teng Zhang; Yunbo Luo; Kunlun Huang; Zhen Zhu; Wentao Xu
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 2.788

2.  Immune analysis of cry1Ab-genetically modified potato by in-silico analysis and animal model.

Authors:  Hassan Rahnama; Mahdi Nikmard; Mohsen Abolhasani; Rahim Osfoori; Forough Sanjarian; Ali Akbar Habashi
Journal:  Food Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 2.391

3.  Comparative compositional analysis of transgenic potato resistant to potato tuber moth (PTM) and its non-transformed counterpart.

Authors:  Hassan Rahnama; Amir Bahram Moradi; Seyed Hamid Mirrokni; Foad Moradi; Mohammad Reza Shams; Mohammad Hossein Fotokian
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 2.788

4.  Comparison of transgenic Gerbera hybrida lines and traditional varieties shows no differences in cytotoxicity or metabolic fingerprints.

Authors:  Miia Marika Ainasoja; Leena Lyydia Pohjala; Päivi Sirpa Marjaana Tammela; Panu Juhani Somervuo; Pia Maarit Vuorela; Teemu Heikki Teeri
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2008-01-30       Impact factor: 2.788

Review 5.  Biosafety and risk assessment framework for selectable marker genes in transgenic crop plants: a case of the science not supporting the politics.

Authors:  Koreen Ramessar; Ariadna Peremarti; Sonia Gómez-Galera; Shaista Naqvi; Marian Moralejo; Pilar Muñoz; Teresa Capell; Paul Christou
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2007-04-14       Impact factor: 3.145

6.  Insect-protected event DAS-81419-2 soybean (Glycine max L.) grown in the United States and Brazil is compositionally equivalent to nontransgenic soybean.

Authors:  Brandon J Fast; Ariane C Schafer; Tempest Y Johnson; Brian L Potts; Rod A Herman
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 5.279

Review 7.  The use of whole food animal studies in the safety assessment of genetically modified crops: limitations and recommendations.

Authors:  Andrew Bartholomaeus; Wayne Parrott; Genevieve Bondy; Kate Walker
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 5.635

8.  Scientific Opinion on development needs for the allergenicity and protein safety assessment of food and feed products derived from biotechnology.

Authors:  Ewen Mullins; Jean-Louis Bresson; Tamas Dalmay; Ian Crawford Dewhurst; Michelle M Epstein; Leslie George Firbank; Philippe Guerche; Jan Hejatko; Hanspeter Naegeli; Fabien Nogué; Nils Rostoks; Jose Juan Sánchez Serrano; Giovanni Savoini; Eve Veromann; Fabio Veronesi; Antonio Fernandez Dumont; Francisco Javier Moreno
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2022-01-25
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.