Literature DB >> 15053336

Mucosal HIV vaccines: where are we now?

Liljana Stevceva1, Warren Strober.   

Abstract

Around the world, approximately 5 million people became infected with HIV in 2001, an estimated 70% via sexual transmission. Numerous studies have demonstrated that it is difficult to achieve total protection from vaginally or rectally acquired HIV/SIV when using parenteral immunization. Mucosal immunization was seen as the best approach to achieve sustainable immune responses at mucosal sites of viral entry. This was further emphasized when several studies implicated rectal and vaginal mucosa as latent reservoirs for the HIV virus and virus-specific CD8+ T cell immune responses in gastrointestinal mucosa were shown to be less efficient than in systemic tissues. Mucosal vaccines utilizing various routes of immunization including intranasal, intrarectal, intravaginal and oral immunization have been tested for their potency to induce virus-specific immune responses systemically but especially at mucosal sites of viral entry. The unsatisfactory results in initiating simultaneously sufficient immune responses at mucosal and systemic sites are being overcomed by use of appropriate and novel adjuvants such as Cholera toxin, Escherichia coli heat-labile toxin, immunostimulatory CpG motifs, coinjection of cytokines and others. Various routes of immunization are now being compared and combinations of mucosal immunization and parenteral boost and vice versa have also been tested. Generations of new vaccines, such as DNA-based vaccines, multipeptide, lipopeptide and alphavirus replicon particles-based vaccines have been created and studied for their efficiency.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15053336     DOI: 10.2174/1570162043485004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr HIV Res        ISSN: 1570-162X            Impact factor:   1.581


  8 in total

1.  Intramuscular rather than oral administration of replication-defective adenoviral vaccine vector induces specific CD8+ T cell responses in the gut.

Authors:  S W Lin; A S Cun; K Harris-McCoy; H C Ertl
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2006-12-06       Impact factor: 3.641

2.  Induction of protection against vaginal shedding and infertility by a recombinant Chlamydia vaccine.

Authors:  Jennifer R Carmichael; Sukumar Pal; Delia Tifrea; Luis M de la Maza
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 3.641

3.  A comparative analysis of HIV-specific mucosal/systemic T cell immunity and avidity following rDNA/rFPV and poxvirus-poxvirus prime boost immunisations.

Authors:  Charani Ranasinghe; Fiona Eyers; John Stambas; David B Boyle; Ian A Ramshaw; Alistair J Ramsay
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 3.641

4.  Glycoproteins isolated from Atractylodes macrocephala Koidz improve protective immune response induction in a mouse model.

Authors:  Kyoung-A Kim; Young-Ok Son; So-Soon Kim; Yong-Suk Jang; Young-Hyun Baek; Chun-Chu Kim; Jeong-Hoon Lee; Jeong-Chae Lee
Journal:  Food Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2018-07-10       Impact factor: 2.391

5.  Live attenuated Listeria monocytogenes expressing HIV Gag: immunogenicity in rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Shisong Jiang; Robert A Rasmussen; Katrina M Nolan; Fred R Frankel; Judy Lieberman; Harold M McClure; Kristina M Williams; Uma S Babu; Richard B Raybourne; Elizabeth Strobert; Ruth M Ruprecht
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2007-08-27       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 6.  Mucosal immunity and protection against HIV/SIV infection: strategies and challenges for vaccine design.

Authors:  Thorsten Demberg; Marjorie Robert-Guroff
Journal:  Int Rev Immunol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 5.311

7.  Sequential cisplatin therapy and vaccination with HPV16 E6E7L2 fusion protein in saponin adjuvant GPI-0100 for the treatment of a model HPV16+ cancer.

Authors:  Shiwen Peng; Joshua W Wang; Balasubramanyam Karanam; Chenguang Wang; Warner K Huh; Ronald D Alvarez; Sara I Pai; Chien-fu Hung; T-C Wu; Richard B S Roden
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-01-05       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Vaccines: past, present and future.

Authors:  Stanley A Plotkin
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 53.440

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.