L Leeds1, R J Meara, J P Hobson. 1. Department of Clinical Psychology, University of Wales, Bangor, UK. lesleyleeds@hotmail.com
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the utility of an observer-based rating scale to detect depression in patients without aphasia. DESIGN: Correlation analysis between the Stroke Aphasia Depression Questionnaire, shortened version (SADQ-10) and a validated self-rating measure of depression, the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS). The sensitivity and specificity of the SADQ-10 were also calculated. SETTING: Stroke rehabilitation unit. SUBJECTS: Sixty-five stroke patients without significant aphasia undergoing rehabilitation. INTERVENTIONS: All patients were assessed with the GDS-15 and the SADQ-10. RESULTS: The SADQ-10 at a cut-point of 14 out of 30 had a sensitivity of 70% and a specificity of 77% to detect depression. This measure demonstrated good internal consistency but showed only a modest correlation with the GDS-15 (r = 0.40, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In the population under study the SADQ-10 did not appear to be a valid measure of depression compared with the GDS and, therefore, may not be suitable for use in patients without significant aphasia.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the utility of an observer-based rating scale to detect depression in patients without aphasia. DESIGN: Correlation analysis between the Stroke Aphasia Depression Questionnaire, shortened version (SADQ-10) and a validated self-rating measure of depression, the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS). The sensitivity and specificity of the SADQ-10 were also calculated. SETTING:Stroke rehabilitation unit. SUBJECTS: Sixty-five strokepatients without significant aphasia undergoing rehabilitation. INTERVENTIONS: All patients were assessed with the GDS-15 and the SADQ-10. RESULTS: The SADQ-10 at a cut-point of 14 out of 30 had a sensitivity of 70% and a specificity of 77% to detect depression. This measure demonstrated good internal consistency but showed only a modest correlation with the GDS-15 (r = 0.40, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In the population under study the SADQ-10 did not appear to be a valid measure of depression compared with the GDS and, therefore, may not be suitable for use in patients without significant aphasia.
Authors: Stephanie Gillespie; Jacqueline Laures-Gore; Elliot Moore; Matthew Farina; Scott Russell; Benjamin Haaland Journal: J Speech Lang Hear Res Date: 2018-12-10 Impact factor: 2.297
Authors: Lisa Edelkraut; Diana López-Barroso; María José Torres-Prioris; Sergio E Starkstein; Ricardo E Jorge; Jessica Aloisi; Marcelo L Berthier; Guadalupe Dávila Journal: World J Psychiatry Date: 2022-03-19