OBJECTIVE: To investigate functional outcome in two groups of children with sacral level paralysis: myelomeningocele (MMC) versus lipomyelomeningocele (LMMC). Additionally both groups were compared with each other and when possible with reference values. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study by means of (1) clinical assessment, and (2) disability measurement. SETTING: Spina bifida outpatient clinic at a university hospital in the Netherlands. SUBJECTS: Sample of 30 children with MMC and 14 with LMMC. Mean age (SD) 6.0 (4.9) and 8.4 (4.9) years respectively. MAIN MEASURES: Muscle strength, ambulation level, motor performance (Bayley Scales of Infant Development (BSID) and Movement Assessment Battery for Children), and the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI). RESULTS: The majority of patients in both groups were normal ambulant, 14/21 (67%) in MMC and 9/14 (64%) in LMMC. Ambulation was strongly associated with muscle strength of hip abductors (odds ratio (OR): 13.5, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.5-73.7), and ankle dorsal-flexor muscles (OR: 110, 95% CI 8.9-135.9). No significant differences were found in lesion and ambulation level. Muscle strength and motor performance were significantly lower in the MMC group than in the LMMC group (p < 0.05). PEDI scores were comparable in both groups. Most problems were noted in mobility skills and caregiver assistance in self-care, especially regarding bladder and bowel management. CONCLUSIONS: Gross motor and functional problems were seen in both groups. The MMC group showed more muscle weakness and motor problems. However, in both groups caregiver assistance was needed for a prolonged period, especially regarding bladder and bowel management. These findings need special attention, particularly in children who attend regular schools.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate functional outcome in two groups of children with sacral level paralysis: myelomeningocele (MMC) versus lipomyelomeningocele (LMMC). Additionally both groups were compared with each other and when possible with reference values. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study by means of (1) clinical assessment, and (2) disability measurement. SETTING: Spina bifida outpatient clinic at a university hospital in the Netherlands. SUBJECTS: Sample of 30 children with MMC and 14 with LMMC. Mean age (SD) 6.0 (4.9) and 8.4 (4.9) years respectively. MAIN MEASURES: Muscle strength, ambulation level, motor performance (Bayley Scales of Infant Development (BSID) and Movement Assessment Battery for Children), and the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI). RESULTS: The majority of patients in both groups were normal ambulant, 14/21 (67%) in MMC and 9/14 (64%) in LMMC. Ambulation was strongly associated with muscle strength of hip abductors (odds ratio (OR): 13.5, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.5-73.7), and ankle dorsal-flexor muscles (OR: 110, 95% CI 8.9-135.9). No significant differences were found in lesion and ambulation level. Muscle strength and motor performance were significantly lower in the MMC group than in the LMMC group (p < 0.05). PEDI scores were comparable in both groups. Most problems were noted in mobility skills and caregiver assistance in self-care, especially regarding bladder and bowel management. CONCLUSIONS: Gross motor and functional problems were seen in both groups. The MMC group showed more muscle weakness and motor problems. However, in both groups caregiver assistance was needed for a prolonged period, especially regarding bladder and bowel management. These findings need special attention, particularly in children who attend regular schools.
Authors: Lisa A Jacobson; Reem A Tarazi; Mark D McCurdy; Scott Schultz; Eric Levey; E Mark Mahone; T Andrew Zabel Journal: Rehabil Psychol Date: 2013-02
Authors: Brad E Dicianno; Amol Karmarkar; Amy Houtrow; Theresa M Crytzer; Katelyn M Cushanick; Andrew McCoy; Pamela Wilson; James Chinarian; Jacob Neufeld; Kathryn Smith; Diane M Collins Journal: Am J Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 2.159
Authors: Jennifer K Sansom; Caroline Teulier; Beth A Smith; Victoria Moerchen; Karin Muraszko; Beverly D Ulrich Journal: Pediatr Phys Ther Date: 2013 Impact factor: 3.049
Authors: Laurien M Buffart; Rita J G van den Berg-Emons; Marie S van Wijlen-Hempel; Henk J Stam; Marij E Roebroeck Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2008-02-01 Impact factor: 3.078