Literature DB >> 15052504

The application of mathematical modelling to aspects of adjuvant chemotherapy scheduling.

E A Gaffney1.   

Abstract

In this paper simple models for tumour growth incorporating age-structured cell cycle dynamics are considered in the presence of two non-cross-resistant S-phase specific chemotherapeutic drugs. According to the seminal work of Goldie and Coldman, if one cannot deliver two cell cycle phase non-specific, non-cross-resistant drugs simultaneously, for example due to toxicity, and both drugs are identical apart from resistance, one should alternate their delivery as rapidly as possible. However consider S-phase specific drugs. One might speculate that, for example, alternating the two drugs at intervals of T, where T is the mean cell cycle time, is better than alternating the drugs at intervals of T/2, as the latter strategy allows the possibility of a cell cycle sanctuary. Such speculation implicitly requires a sufficiently low variance of the cell cycle time, and hence it is not clear if such reasoning prevents a generalisation of the results of Goldie and Coldman. This question is addressed in this paper via a detailed modelling investigation, as motivated by suggestions for future colorectal adjuvant chemotherapy trials and developments in hepatic arterial infusion technology. It is shown that the cell cycle distribution of the resistant cell populations is strongly influenced by the chemotherapy schedule. The consequences of this can be dramatic, and can lead to chemotherapy failure at resonant chemotherapy timings, especially for a small standard deviation of the cell cycle time. The novel aspects of this observation are highlighted compared to other models in the literature exhibiting resonant behaviour in the timing of a periodic chemotherapy protocol. The above investigation also results in the principal prediction of this paper that reducing the drug alternation time to approximately a few hours, if possible, can result in substantial improvements in predicted chemotherapy outcomes. Critically, such improvements are not predicted by the Goldie Coldman model or other chemotherapy scheduling models in the literature.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 15052504     DOI: 10.1007/s00285-003-0246-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Math Biol        ISSN: 0303-6812            Impact factor:   2.259


  41 in total

1.  The Norton-Simon hypothesis revisited.

Authors:  L Norton; R Simon
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep       Date:  1986-01

2.  Rationale for the use of alternating non-cross-resistant chemotherapy.

Authors:  J H Goldie; A J Coldman; G A Gudauskas
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep       Date:  1982-03

3.  Kinetic heterogeneity of an experimental tumour revealed by BrdUrd incorporation and mathematical modelling.

Authors:  Alessandro Bertuzzi; Mario Faretta; Alberto Gandolfi; Carmela Sinisgalli; Giuseppe Starace; Giorgio Valoti; Paolo Ubezio
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 1.758

Review 4.  Systemic treatment of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  N C Tebbutt; E Cattell; R Midgley; D Cunningham; D Kerr
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 9.162

Review 5.  5-fluorouracil: a pharmacological paradigm in the use of cytotoxics.

Authors:  D M Thomas; J R Zalcberg
Journal:  Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 2.557

6.  Application of theoretical models to chemotherapy protocol design.

Authors:  J H Goldie; A J Coldman
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep       Date:  1986-01

7.  Quantitative model for multiple levels of drug resistance in clinical tumors.

Authors:  J H Goldie; A J Coldman
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep       Date:  1983-10

Review 8.  Regional chemotherapy of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  N E Kemeny
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1995 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 9.162

9.  Drug resistance as a dynamic process in a model for multistep gene amplification under various levels of selection stringency.

Authors:  L E Harnevo; Z Agur
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.333

10.  Adjuvant treatment of colorectal cancer (current expert opinion derived from the Third International Conference: Perspectives in Colorectal Cancer, Dublin, 2001).

Authors:  E Van Cutsem; M Dicato; J Wils; D Cunningham; E Diaz-Rubio; B Glimelius; D Haller; P Johnston; D Kerr; C H Koehne; R Labianca; B Minsky; B Nordlinger; A Roth; P Rougier; H J Schmoll
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 9.162

View more
  8 in total

1.  An elementary approach to modeling drug resistance in cancer.

Authors:  Cristian Tomasetti; Doron Levy
Journal:  Math Biosci Eng       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.080

2.  A spatial model of tumor-host interaction: application of chemotherapy.

Authors:  Peter Hinow; Philip Gerlee; Lisa J McCawley; Vito Quaranta; Madalina Ciobanu; Shizhen Wang; Jason M Graham; Bruce P Ayati; Jonathan Claridge; Kristin R Swanson; Mary Loveless; Alexander R A Anderson
Journal:  Math Biosci Eng       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 2.080

3.  Spatial invasion dynamics on random and unstructured meshes: implications for heterogeneous tumor populations.

Authors:  V S K Manem; M Kohandel; N L Komarova; S Sivaloganathan
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 2.691

Review 4.  Towards a multiscale model of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Ingeborg M M van Leeuwen; Carina M Edwards; Mohammad Ilyas; Helen M Byrne
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Proliferation rates of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1)-associated tumors.

Authors:  Gerard V Walls; Anita A C Reed; Jeshmi Jeyabalan; Mahsa Javid; Nathan R Hill; Brian Harding; Rajesh V Thakker
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 4.736

6.  Optimizing combination therapies with existing and future CML drugs.

Authors:  Allen A Katouli; Natalia L Komarova
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-08-23       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  TNF-α inhibitor reduces drug-resistance to anti-PD-1: A mathematical model.

Authors:  Xiulan Lai; Wenrui Hao; Avner Friedman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  How to mathematically optimize drug regimens using optimal control.

Authors:  Helen Moore
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 2.745

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.