OBJECTIVE: The long-term results of the surgical treatment for patients with pulmonary metastases from uterine malignancies were clarified. METHODS: A total of 133 patients who underwent pulmonary metastasectomy for uterine malignancies were enrolled in the Metastatic Lung Tumor Study Group of Japan between March 1984 and February 2002. These patients constituted the study population, and their clinical, pathologic, and prognostic data were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: The morbidity and mortality rates related to the operation were minimal (1% and 1%, respectively). The 5- and 10-year survivals after the surgical resection in all cases were 54.6% and 44.9%, respectively. The 5-year survivals for each histologic type were estimated to be 46.8% for squamous cell carcinoma (n = 58), 40.3% for cervical adenocarcinoma (n = 13), 75.7% for endometrial adenocarcinoma (n = 23), 86.5% for choriocarcinoma (n = 16), and 37.9% for leiomyosarcoma (n = 11). In the univariate analysis, the following were shown to be associated with poor survival: primary tumor in the cervix, short disease-free interval (<12 months), large number of resected metastases (> or =4), and large tumor size (> or =3 cm). After mutual adjustment, short disease-free interval (<12 months) alone was related to risk of death (hazard ratio = 2.26, 95% confidence interval = 1.06-4.78) for 105 patients, excluding patients with choriocarcinoma and miscellaneous histologic types. CONCLUSION: Pulmonary metastasectomy for uterine malignancies is a safe and acceptable treatment to improve survival. Patients with a disease-free interval of 12 months or more are good candidates for this treatment if there is adequate control of the primary tumor without extrapulmonary metastasis.
OBJECTIVE: The long-term results of the surgical treatment for patients with pulmonary metastases from uterine malignancies were clarified. METHODS: A total of 133 patients who underwent pulmonary metastasectomy for uterine malignancies were enrolled in the Metastatic Lung Tumor Study Group of Japan between March 1984 and February 2002. These patients constituted the study population, and their clinical, pathologic, and prognostic data were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: The morbidity and mortality rates related to the operation were minimal (1% and 1%, respectively). The 5- and 10-year survivals after the surgical resection in all cases were 54.6% and 44.9%, respectively. The 5-year survivals for each histologic type were estimated to be 46.8% for squamous cell carcinoma (n = 58), 40.3% for cervical adenocarcinoma (n = 13), 75.7% for endometrial adenocarcinoma (n = 23), 86.5% for choriocarcinoma (n = 16), and 37.9% for leiomyosarcoma (n = 11). In the univariate analysis, the following were shown to be associated with poor survival: primary tumor in the cervix, short disease-free interval (<12 months), large number of resected metastases (> or =4), and large tumor size (> or =3 cm). After mutual adjustment, short disease-free interval (<12 months) alone was related to risk of death (hazard ratio = 2.26, 95% confidence interval = 1.06-4.78) for 105 patients, excluding patients with choriocarcinoma and miscellaneous histologic types. CONCLUSION: Pulmonary metastasectomy for uterine malignancies is a safe and acceptable treatment to improve survival. Patients with a disease-free interval of 12 months or more are good candidates for this treatment if there is adequate control of the primary tumor without extrapulmonary metastasis.
Authors: Martee L Hensley; Brigitte A Barrette; Klaus Baumann; David Gaffney; Anne L Hamilton; Jae-Weon Kim; Johanna U Maenpaa; Patricia Pautier; Nadeem Ahmad Siddiqui; Anneke M Westermann; Isabelle Ray-Coquard Journal: Int J Gynecol Cancer Date: 2014-11 Impact factor: 3.437
Authors: Paulina Cybulska; Vasileios Sioulas; Theofano Orfanelli; Oliver Zivanovic; Jennifer J Mueller; Vance A Broach; Kara C Long Roche; Yukio Sonoda; Martee L Hensley; Roisin E O'Cearbhaill; Dennis S Chi; Kaled M Alektiar; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Mario M Leitao Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2019-06-12 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: D Denschlag; F C Thiel; S Ackermann; P Harter; I Juhasz-Boess; P Mallmann; H-G Strauss; U Ulrich; L-C Horn; D Schmidt; D Vordermark; T Vogl; P Reichardt; P Gaß; M Gebhardt; M W Beckmann Journal: Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd Date: 2015-10 Impact factor: 2.915