Literature DB >> 1505179

A comparative study of formaldehyde detection using chromotropic acid, acetylacetone and HPLC in cosmetics and household cleaning products.

M Gryllaki-Berger1, C Mugny, D Perrenoud, A Pannatier, E Frenk.   

Abstract

Chromotropic acid and acetylacetone methods for qualitative determination of formaldehyde were tested in parallel on 48 commercial samples, with high-performance liquid chromotography (HPLC) implemented for quantitative measure. In addition, interference with the detection of formaldehyde was investigated by analyzing 12 other aldehydes and ketones, 7 essential oils and 3 polysorbates. Throughout this comparative study, the disadvantages of the chromotropic acid method, of which 2 variants were used, were delineated and we found that the acetylacetone test proved to be a more efficient screening method for formaldehyde detection in a clinical laboratory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1505179     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1992.tb00284.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contact Dermatitis        ISSN: 0105-1873            Impact factor:   6.600


  2 in total

1.  Towards a Non-Biased Formaldehyde Quantification in Leather: New Derivatization Conditions before HPLC Analysis of 2,4-Dinitrophenylhydrazine Derivatives.

Authors:  Caroline Bourgeois; Nicolas Blanc; Jean-Claude Cannot; Claire Demesmay
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 4.411

Review 2.  Approaches to Formaldehyde Measurement: From Liquid Biological Samples to Cells and Organisms.

Authors:  Fedor A Lipskerov; Ekaterina V Sheshukova; Tatiana V Komarova
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 6.208

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.