Literature DB >> 15051710

Risk adjustment for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: an administrative approach versus EuroSCORE.

Cristina Ugolini1, Lucia Nobilio.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the ability of administrative data in predicting in-hospital mortality for patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery.
METHODS: Patient data were obtained from the administrative databases on hospital discharge abstracts of the Italian region Emilia Romagna for the years 2000-2001. We used a multivariate logistic regression analysis to compare an ICD-9-CM risk adjustment approach based on administrative variables (such as age, gender, principal diagnosis, combined operation, previous cardiac surgery, emergency admission, and Charlson comorbidity index) with a risk adjustment approach based on the clinical European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE) to predict in-hospital mortality and to assess hospital performance. In order to distinguish complications of care from comorbidities, we linked hospital data across multiple episodes of care up to 1 year before the admission for coronary artery bypass graft (CABG).
RESULTS: The risk adjustment approach based on ICD-9-CM data provides good explanatory ability in models assessing in-hospital mortality (the c statistics obtained are very close: c = 0.76 in 2000 and c = 0.80 in 2001 for the administrative model versus 0.78 in 2000 and 0.77 in 2001 for the clinical one) and in those ranking the centres (c = 0.78 in 2000 in both approaches, and c = 0.82 for the administrative model versus c = 0.78 for the clinical one in 2001).
CONCLUSIONS: Adding some administrative variables considered proxy for clinical complexity to the administrative model and linking hospital data across patients' multiple episodes of care eliminated much of the difference in effectiveness between the clinical and administrative risk adjustment approach. Focusing on the health policy context of measuring CABG death rates, our study strengthened the thesis that, with the growing improvement in accurate coding practice, administrative databases could provide a valuable and economical source for health planning and research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15051710     DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzh016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care        ISSN: 1353-4505            Impact factor:   2.038


  6 in total

1.  Comparison of cardiac surgery mortality reports using administrative and clinical data sources: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Cedric Manlhiot; Vivek Rao; Barry Rubin; Douglas S Lee
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2018-09-04

2.  P.Re.Val.E.: outcome research program for the evaluation of health care quality in Lazio, Italy.

Authors:  Danilo Fusco; Anna P Barone; Chiara Sorge; Mariangela D'Ovidio; Massimo Stafoggia; Adele Lallo; Marina Davoli; Carlo A Perucci
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 2.655

3.  The Dutch hospital standardised mortality ratio (HSMR) method and cardiac surgery: benchmarking in a national cohort using hospital administration data versus a clinical database.

Authors:  S Siregar; M E Pouw; K G M Moons; M I M Versteegh; M L Bots; Y van der Graaf; C J Kalkman; L A van Herwerden; R H H Groenwold
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 5.994

4.  The National Outcomes Evaluation Programme in Italy: The Impact of Publication of Health Indicators.

Authors:  Paola Colais; Luigi Pinnarelli; Francesca Mataloni; Barbara Giordani; Giorgia Duranti; Paola D'Errigo; Stefano Rosato; Fulvia Seccareccia; Giovanni Baglio; Marina Davoli
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-09-16       Impact factor: 4.614

5.  Case-mix and the use of control charts in monitoring mortality rates after coronary artery bypass.

Authors:  Tom Marshall; Mohammed A Mohammed
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-04-30       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  Comparison of risk-scoring systems in the prediction of outcome after liver resection.

Authors:  S Ulyett; G Shahtahmassebi; S Aroori; M J Bowles; C D Briggs; M G Wiggans; G Minto; D A Stell
Journal:  Perioper Med (Lond)       Date:  2017-11-25
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.