Literature DB >> 15051575

A growing concern: inability to diagnose vulvovaginal infections correctly.

William J Ledger1, Gilles R G Monif.   

Abstract

The accurate diagnosis of vulvovaginitis should distinguish obstetrician-gynecologists from the vast majority of primary care physicians. Diagnostic accuracy is lost when physicians are unable to do a microscopic examination of vaginal secretions, as well as a "whiff" test and a pH determination. Structured instruction in the use of a microscope should be a required component of obstetrics and gynecology residency training. Physician compensation for this testing should be commensurate with the time and office expense required to provide this service.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15051575     DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000114988.61223.22

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  2 in total

1.  Accuracy of the clinical diagnosis of vaginitis compared with a DNA probe laboratory standard.

Authors:  Nancy K Lowe; Jeremy L Neal; Nancy A Ryan-Wenger
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Highly-cited estimates of the cumulative incidence and recurrence of vulvovaginal candidiasis are inadequately documented.

Authors:  Sujit D Rathod; Patricia A Buffler
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2014-03-10       Impact factor: 2.809

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.