Literature DB >> 15051567

Routine follow-up visits after first-trimester induced abortion.

Daniel Grossman1, Charlotte Ellertson, David A Grimes, Dilys Walker.   

Abstract

Routine follow-up visits after abortion are intended to confirm that the abortion is complete and to diagnose and treat complications. Many clinicians also take advantage of the follow-up visit to provide general reproductive health care: discussing contraceptive plans and providing family planning services; diagnosing sexually transmitted infections; performing a Pap test or discussing abnormal Pap results. We reviewed the evidence related to the routine postabortion follow-up visit. Other than mifepristone medical abortion performed at 50 days of gestation or later and methotrexate medical abortion, we found little evidence that mandatory follow-up visits typically detect conditions that women themselves could not be taught to recognize. In addition, the natural history of the most severe complications after abortion-infection and unrecognized ectopic pregnancy-have time courses inconsistent with the usual timing of the follow-up visit. Costs associated with this visit can be great. These include travel expenses, lost wages, child-care expenses, privacy and emotional burdens for women, and scheduling disruptions and the related opportunity costs caused by "no-shows" for the provider. Follow-up appointments should be scheduled for those women likely to benefit from a physical examination. For the remainder of women, simple instructions and advice about detecting complications, possibly coupled with telephone follow-up, might suffice. Although arguably valuable in their own right, counseling, family planning services, or sexually transmitted infection diagnosis and treatment should not be so inflexibly bundled with postabortion care. Protocols that require in-person follow-up after abortion may not make the best use of a women's time or abilities, or of the medical system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15051567     DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000115511.14004.19

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  15 in total

1.  Safety of aspiration abortion performed by nurse practitioners, certified nurse midwives, and physician assistants under a California legal waiver.

Authors:  Tracy A Weitz; Diana Taylor; Sheila Desai; Ushma D Upadhyay; Jeff Waldman; Molly F Battistelli; Eleanor A Drey
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Immediate postabortion intrauterine device insertion: continuation and satisfaction.

Authors:  Colleen McNicholas; Taylor Hotchkiss; Tessa Madden; Qiuhong Zhao; Jenifer Allsworth; Jeffrey F Peipert
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2012 Jul-Aug

Review 3.  Immediate versus delayed postabortal insertion of contraceptive implant.

Authors:  Jen Sothornwit; Nuntasiri Eamudomkarn; Pisake Lumbiganon; Nampet Jampathong; Mario R Festin; Lingling Salang
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-05-18

4.  Safety and effectiveness of self-managed medication abortion provided using online telemedicine in the United States: A population based study.

Authors:  Abigail R A Aiken; Evdokia P Romanova; Julia R Morber; Rebecca Gomperts
Journal:  Lancet Reg Health Am       Date:  2022-02-17

Review 5.  Associations between intimate partner violence and termination of pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Megan Hall; Lucy C Chappell; Bethany L Parnell; Paul T Seed; Susan Bewley
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 11.069

Review 6.  Recent advances in contraception.

Authors:  Abigail R A Aiken; James Trussell
Journal:  F1000Prime Rep       Date:  2014-12-01

7.  Experiences and characteristics of women seeking and completing at-home medical termination of pregnancy through online telemedicine in Ireland and Northern Ireland: a population-based analysis.

Authors:  Ara Aiken; R Gomperts; J Trussell
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 6.531

Review 8.  The microeconomics of abortion: A scoping review and analysis of the economic consequences for abortion care-seekers.

Authors:  Ernestina Coast; Samantha R Lattof; Yana van der Meulen Rodgers; Brittany Moore; Cheri Poss
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Sublingual misoprostol versus standard surgical care for treatment of incomplete abortion in five sub-Saharan African countries.

Authors:  Tara Shochet; Ayisha Diop; Alioune Gaye; Madi Nayama; Aissata Bal Sall; Fawole Bukola; Thieba Blandine; Okunlola Michael Abiola; Blami Dao; Ogunbode Olayinka; Beverly Winikoff
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  Acceptability of Home-Assessment Post Medical Abortion and Medical Abortion in a Low-Resource Setting in Rajasthan, India. Secondary Outcome Analysis of a Non-Inferiority Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Mandira Paul; Kirti Iyengar; Birgitta Essén; Kristina Gemzell-Danielsson; Sharad D Iyengar; Johan Bring; Sunita Soni; Marie Klingberg-Allvin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.