BACKGROUND:Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is an approved treatment for epilepsy and has been investigated in clinical trials of depression. Little is known about the relationship of VNS parameters to brain function. Using the interleaved VNS /functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) technique, we tested whether variations of VNS pulse width (PW) would produce different immediate brain activation in a manner consistent with single neuron PW studies. METHODS:Twelve adult patients with major depression, treated with VNS, underwent three consecutive VNS/fMRI scans, each randomly using one of three PWs (130 micros, 250 micros, or 500 micros). The data were analyzed with SPM2. RESULTS:Global activations induced by PWs 250 and 500 were both significantly greater than that induced by PW 130 but not significantly different from each other. For global deactivation, PWs 130 and 250 were both significantly greater than PW 500 but not significantly different from each other. Regional similarities and differences were also seen with the various PWs. CONCLUSIONS: The data confirm our hypothesis that VNS at PW 500 globally produces no more activation than does PW 250, and PW 130 is insufficient for activation of some regions. These data suggest that PW is an important variable in producing VNS brain effects.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is an approved treatment for epilepsy and has been investigated in clinical trials of depression. Little is known about the relationship of VNS parameters to brain function. Using the interleaved VNS /functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) technique, we tested whether variations of VNS pulse width (PW) would produce different immediate brain activation in a manner consistent with single neuron PW studies. METHODS: Twelve adult patients with major depression, treated with VNS, underwent three consecutive VNS/fMRI scans, each randomly using one of three PWs (130 micros, 250 micros, or 500 micros). The data were analyzed with SPM2. RESULTS: Global activations induced by PWs 250 and 500 were both significantly greater than that induced by PW 130 but not significantly different from each other. For global deactivation, PWs 130 and 250 were both significantly greater than PW 500 but not significantly different from each other. Regional similarities and differences were also seen with the various PWs. CONCLUSIONS: The data confirm our hypothesis that VNS at PW 500 globally produces no more activation than does PW 250, and PW 130 is insufficient for activation of some regions. These data suggest that PW is an important variable in producing VNS brain effects.
Authors: Bashar W Badran; Logan T Dowdle; Oliver J Mithoefer; Nicholas T LaBate; James Coatsworth; Joshua C Brown; William H DeVries; Christopher W Austelle; Lisa M McTeague; Mark S George Journal: Brain Stimul Date: 2017-12-29 Impact factor: 8.955
Authors: Charles R Conway; Yvette I Sheline; John T Chibnall; Richard D Bucholz; Joseph L Price; Sunil Gangwani; Mark A Mintun Journal: Brain Stimul Date: 2011-04-03 Impact factor: 8.955
Authors: Charles R Conway; John T Chibnall; Sunil Gangwani; Mark A Mintun; Joseph L Price; Tamara Hershey; Luis A Giuffra; Richard D Bucholz; Jon J Christensen; Yvette I Sheline Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2012-03-05 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: Hugo D Critchley; Penelope A Lewis; Michael Orth; Oliver Josephs; Ralf Deichmann; Michael R Trimble; Raymond J Dolan Journal: Psychosom Med Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 4.312
Authors: Jamie S Bodenlos; Samet Kose; Jeffrey J Borckardt; Ziad Nahas; Patrick M O'Neil; Sherry L Pagoto; Mark S George Journal: J Diabetes Sci Technol Date: 2007-09