Literature DB >> 15050815

Depth-of-focus of the human eye in the near retinal periphery.

Bin Wang1, Kenneth J Ciuffreda.   

Abstract

Although the depth-of-focus in the foveal region has been well investigated, knowledge regarding the effect of retinal eccentricity on blur detection and sensitivity is limited. In the present study, the depth-of-focus at the fovea and in the near retinal periphery (0 degrees -8 degrees ) was assessed psychophysically in 7 human subjects using a 5 mm artificial pupil with accommodation paralyzed. The group mean total depth-of-focus progressively increased linearly from 0.89 D at the fovea to 3.51 D at a retinal eccentricity of 8 degrees at the rate of 0.29 D/degree, with response variability (S.E.M.) remaining relatively constant (+/-0.17 D). We speculate that the reduced detection and sensitivity to blur in the near periphery may be attributed to retinal topography, sharpness overconstancy, optical aberrations, and visual attention in peripheral vision.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15050815     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2004.01.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  9 in total

1.  Paraxial analysis of the depth of field of a pseudophakic eye with accommodating intraocular lens.

Authors:  Jit B Ale; Fabrice Manns; Arthur Ho
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.973

2.  An objective technique to measure the depth-of-focus in free space.

Authors:  Balamurali Vasudevan; Kenneth J Ciuffreda; Bin Wang
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-12-15       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Myopia Control Effect Is Influenced by Baseline Relative Peripheral Refraction in Children Wearing Defocus Incorporated Multiple Segments (DIMS) Spectacle Lenses.

Authors:  Hanyu Zhang; Carly S Y Lam; Wing-Chun Tang; Myra Leung; Hua Qi; Paul H Lee; Chi-Ho To
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 4.964

4.  Accommodation and pupil responses to random-dot stereograms.

Authors:  Rajaraman Suryakumar; Robert Allison
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2015-04-16

5.  The natural statistics of blur.

Authors:  William W Sprague; Emily A Cooper; Sylvain Reissier; Baladitya Yellapragada; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Blur perception throughout the visual field in myopia and emmetropia.

Authors:  Guido Maiello; Lenna Walker; Peter J Bex; Fuensanta A Vera-Diaz
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Factors Influencing Pseudo-Accommodation-The Difference between Subjectively Reported Range of Clear Focus and Objectively Measured Accommodation Range.

Authors:  Sandeep K Dhallu; Amy L Sheppard; Tom Drew; Toshifumi Mihashi; Juan F Zapata-Díaz; Hema Radhakrishnan; D Robert Iskander; James S Wolffsohn
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2019-06-28

8.  The blur horopter: Retinal conjugate surface in binocular viewing.

Authors:  Agostino Gibaldi; Vivek Labhishetty; Larry N Thibos; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Changes in accommodation and behavioural performance with a contact lens for myopia management: A comparison between a dual-focus and a single-vision soft contact lens.

Authors:  Beatriz Redondo; Jesús Vera; Rubén Molina; Tomás Galán; Pedro Machado; Raimundo Jiménez
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2022-03-19       Impact factor: 3.992

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.