Literature DB >> 15050551

Brain activity relating to the contingent negative variation: an fMRI investigation.

Y Nagai1, H D Critchley, E Featherstone, P B C Fenwick, M R Trimble, R J Dolan.   

Abstract

The contingent negative variation (CNV) is a long-latency electroencephalography (EEG) surface negative potential with cognitive and motor components, observed during response anticipation. CNV is an index of cortical arousal during orienting and attention, yet its functional neuroanatomical basis is poorly understood. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) with simultaneous EEG and recording of galvanic skin response (GSR) to investigate CNV-related central neural activity and its relationship to peripheral autonomic arousal. In a group analysis, blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) activity during the period of CNV generation was enhanced in thalamus, somatomotor cortex, bilateral midcingulate, supplementary motor, and insular cortices. Enhancement of CNV-related activity in anterior and midcingulate, SMA, and insular cortices was associated with decreases in peripheral sympathetic arousal. In a subset of subjects in whom we acquired simultaneous EEG and fMRI data, we observed activity in bilateral thalamus, anterior cingulate, and supplementary motor cortex that was modulated by trial-by-trial amplitude of CNV. These findings provide a likely functional neuroanatomical substrate for the CNV and demonstrate modulation of components of this neural circuitry by peripheral autonomic arousal. Moreover, these data suggest a mechanistic model whereby thalamocortical interactions regulate CNV amplitude.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15050551     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.10.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  101 in total

1.  Preparatory activity and connectivity in dorsal anterior cingulate cortex for cognitive control.

Authors:  Kurt P Schulz; Anne-Claude V Bédard; Rosa Czarnecki; Jin Fan
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-04-16       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Cognitive activation by central thalamic stimulation: the yerkes-dodson law revisited.

Authors:  Robert G Mair; Kristen D Onos; Jacqueline R Hembrook
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 2.658

Review 3.  The restless brain.

Authors:  Marcus E Raichle
Journal:  Brain Connect       Date:  2011

4.  Neural correlates of heat-evoked pain memory in humans.

Authors:  Liping Wang; Peng Gui; Lei Li; Yixuan Ku; Mark Bodner; Gaojie Fan; Yong-Di Zhou; Xiao-Wei Dong
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 5.  What is the role of brain mechanisms underlying arousal in recovery of motor function after structural brain injuries?

Authors:  Andrew M Goldfine; Nicholas D Schiff
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 5.710

6.  MEG reveals different contributions of somatomotor cortex and cerebellum to simple reaction time after temporally structured cues.

Authors:  Tim Martin; Jon M Houck; Joel Pearson Bish; Dubravko Kicić; C Chad Woodruff; Sandra N Moses; Dustin C Lee; Claudia D Tesche
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Complex relationship between BOLD signal and synchronization/desynchronization of human brain MEG oscillations.

Authors:  Georg Winterer; Frederick W Carver; Francesco Musso; Venkata Mattay; Daniel R Weinberger; Richard Coppola
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Brain activity during a motor learning task: an fMRI and skin conductance study.

Authors:  Bradley J Macintosh; Richard Mraz; William E McIlroy; Simon J Graham
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 9.  Recovery of consciousness after brain injury: a mesocircuit hypothesis.

Authors:  Nicholas D Schiff
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 13.837

10.  Elucidating relations between fMRI, ECoG, and EEG through a common natural stimulus.

Authors:  Stefan Haufe; Paul DeGuzman; Simon Henin; Michael Arcaro; Christopher J Honey; Uri Hasson; Lucas C Parra
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.