Literature DB >> 15050494

Accuracy and pitfalls of early diastolic motion of the mitral annulus for diagnosing constrictive pericarditis by tissue Doppler imaging.

Partho P Sengupta1, Jagdish C Mohan, Vimal Mehta, Ramesh Arora, Natesa G Pandian, Bijoy K Khandheria.   

Abstract

Mitral annular velocities are reportedly useful in diagnosing constrictive pericarditis (CP); however, their exact efficacy in larger clinical settings remains unevaluated. This study reexamined the role of longitudinal tissue Doppler imaging in diagnosing CP in clinical practice. Tissue velocity imaging (GE Vingmed System Five) was performed in 122 subjects (87 referred with clinically suspected CP and 35 age- and sex-matched controls). Of the 87 subjects with suspected CP, 45 (51.7%) had CP confirmed at surgery, 11 (12.6%) had restrictive heart disease, 20 (23.0%) had right heart failure due to cor pulmonale, and the other 11 (12.6%) had old pericardial effusions and no hemodynamic evidence of constriction on follow-up echocardiography. Of the 45 patients with CP, mitral early diastolic (Ea) annular velocities from septal and lateral regions were normal (>/=8 cm/s) in 40 (88.9%) and decreased (<8 cm/s) in 1 or both regions in 5 (3 with left ventricular systolic dysfunction, 2 with extensive mitral annular calcification). Of 11 patients with restrictive cardiomyopathy, 8 (72.7%) had reduced Ea (<8 cm/s) and 3 showed normal Ea velocity in 1 or both corners of the mitral annulus. All except 2 patients with right-sided heart failure from cor pulmonale and those with previous pericardial effusion had normal Ea velocities. A normal Ea velocity improved recognition of CP, particularly in the presence of nondiagnostic 2-dimensional or transmitral flow-Doppler imaging. The overall sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing CP using tissue Doppler incrementally with M-mode, 2-dimensional, and transmitral flow Doppler were 88.8% and 94.8%, respectively. Mitral annular velocities help with diagnosis and differentiation of CP in most cases, except in the presence of extensive annular calcification, left ventricular systolic dysfunction, or segmental nonuniformity in myocardial velocities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15050494     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2003.12.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  13 in total

Review 1.  Echocardiography in pericardial diseases: new developments.

Authors:  Gabriella Veress; Dali Feng; Jae K Oh
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 4.214

Review 2.  New Cardiac Imaging Algorithms to Diagnose Constrictive Pericarditis Versus Restrictive Cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Ahmad Mahmoud; Manish Bansal; Partho P Sengupta
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 3.  Advances in the differentiation of constrictive pericarditis and restrictive cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  D R Zwas; I Gotsman; D Admon; A Keren
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.443

4.  Expert consensus for multimodality imaging evaluation of adult patients during and after cancer therapy: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging.

Authors:  Juan Carlos Plana; Maurizio Galderisi; Ana Barac; Michael S Ewer; Bonnie Ky; Marielle Scherrer-Crosbie; Javier Ganame; Igal A Sebag; Deborah A Agler; Luigi P Badano; Jose Banchs; Daniela Cardinale; Joseph Carver; Manuel Cerqueira; Jeanne M DeCara; Thor Edvardsen; Scott D Flamm; Thomas Force; Brian P Griffin; Guy Jerusalem; Jennifer E Liu; Andreia Magalhães; Thomas Marwick; Liza Y Sanchez; Rosa Sicari; Hector R Villarraga; Patrizio Lancellotti
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 6.875

5.  Use and Limitations of E/e' to Assess Left Ventricular Filling Pressure by Echocardiography.

Authors:  Jae-Hyeong Park; Thomas H Marwick
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2011-12-27

Review 6.  Echocardiographic Differentiation of Pericardial Constriction and Left Ventricular Restriction.

Authors:  Hardeep Kaur Grewal; Manish Bansal
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 3.955

7.  Diagnostic superiority of a combined assessment of the systolic and early diastolic mitral annular velocities by tissue Doppler imaging for the differentiation of restrictive cardiomyopathy from constrictive pericarditis.

Authors:  Thomas Butz; C Piper; C Langer; M Wiemer; T Kottmann; A Meissner; G Plehn; H J Trappe; D Horstkotte; L Faber
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 8.  Constrictive pericarditis--a curable diastolic heart failure.

Authors:  Faisal F Syed; Hartzell V Schaff; Jae K Oh
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2014-07-29       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 9.  Pericardial syndromes: an update after the ESC guidelines 2004.

Authors:  Petar M Seferović; Arsen D Ristić; Ružica Maksimović; Dejan S Simeunović; Ivan Milinković; Jelena P Seferović Mitrović; Vladimir Kanjuh; Sabine Pankuweit; Bernhard Maisch
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 4.214

10.  Acute viral myopericarditis presenting as a transient effusive-constrictive pericarditis caused by coinfection with coxsackieviruses A4 and B3.

Authors:  Wang-Soo Lee; Kwang Je Lee; Jee Eun Kwon; Min Seok Oh; Jeong Eun Kim; Eun Jung Cho; Chee Jeong Kim
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 2.884

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.