Literature DB >> 15050321

Tumor volume is not an independent prognostic factor in early-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated by radiotherapy alone.

Daniel T T Chua1, Jonathan S T Sham, Lucullus H T Leung, K S Tai, Gordon K H Au.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine whether the tumor volume can predict the treatment outcome in early-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) treated by radiotherapy alone. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The pretreatment CT scans of 116 patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer Stage I-II NPC treated by radiotherapy alone were retrospectively reviewed. The clinician outlined the tumor extent. The primary tumor volume (PTV) and nodal volume (NV) were then calculated by a summation-of-areas technique. The PTV and NV were correlated with locoregional control, distant failure, and survival. The median follow-up time was 105 months.
RESULTS: Patients with Stage I disease had a 5-year locoregional control rate of 95% and a disease-specific survival (DSS) rate of 97%; for Stage II disease, the corresponding rates were 81% and 79%. The PTV ranged from 1.3 to 75.5 cm3 (median, 12.6 cm3), with substantial overlap between T1 and T2 disease. The NV ranged from 0 to 35.4 cm(3). Patients with a PTV >15 cm3 had significantly worse local control (5-year control rate, 82% vs. 93%; p = 0.033), but no statistically significant difference was noted in survival (5-year DSS rate, 83% vs. 89%; p = 0.30). The difference in local control was mainly seen in those with T2 disease. Patients with NV >4 cm3 had a greater distant failure rate (5-year distant metastasis-free rate, 72% vs. 90%; p = 0.011) and worse survival (5-year DSS rate, 76% vs. 94%; p = 0.0038). Nodal control was excellent with no difference between a NV of < or =4 cm3 and a NV of >4 cm3 (5-year control rate, 97% vs. 100%). The survival rate was worst in patients with a PTV >15 cm3 and a NV >4 cm3 (5-year DSS rate, 68%) and best in those with a PTV of < or =15 cm3 and a NV of < or =4 cm3 (5-year DSS rate, 92%). Multivariate analysis, however, showed that only parapharyngeal extension (T2b) and N1 stage were independent factors that predicted locoregional control and survival, and N1 stage was the only factor that predicted distant failure.
CONCLUSION: The pretreatment tumor volume has a limited prognostic value in early-stage NPC compared with the usual T and N classification, with Stage T2b and N1 as independent factors that predicted treatment outcome. Within T2 disease, the estimation of tumor volume may identify a subgroup of patients with a greater risk of local failure that warrants more aggressive treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15050321     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2003.09.075

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  12 in total

Review 1.  The evolution of nasopharyngeal carcinoma staging.

Authors:  Rui Guo; Yan-Ping Mao; Ling-Long Tang; Lei Chen; Ying Sun; Jun Ma
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-07-12       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma: relationship between fluorine-18 fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography CT maximum standardised uptake value, metabolic tumour volume, and tumour, node and metastasis classification.

Authors:  W-Q Zhu; X Sun; L Xing; M Li; J Yue; W Qu; X Sun; L Kong; J Yu
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Prediction of disease-free survival in patients with squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck using dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging.

Authors:  S Chawla; S Kim; L A Loevner; W-T Hwang; G Weinstein; A Chalian; H Quon; H Poptani
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-02-24       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: Can Pretreatment DWI Predict Local Failure Based on Long-Term Outcome?

Authors:  B K H Law; A D King; K S Bhatia; A T Ahuja; M K M Kam; B B Ma; Q Y Ai; F K F Mo; J Yuan; D K W Yeung
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Prognostic value of tumor volume in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Jeong-Hyun Kim; Joon-Kyoo Lee
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2005-04-30       Impact factor: 2.759

6.  Tumor volume is an independent prognostic indicator of local control in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy.

Authors:  Mei Feng; Weidong Wang; Zixuan Fan; Binyu Fu; Jie Li; Shichuan Zhang; Jinyi Lang
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 3.481

7.  Prognostic value and predictive threshold of tumor volume for patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma receiving intensity-modulated radiotherapy.

Authors:  Yu-Xiang He; Ying Wang; Peng-Fei Cao; Lin Shen; Ya-Jie Zhao; Zi-Jian Zhang; Deng-Ming Chen; Tu-Bao Yang; Xin-Qiong Huang; Zhou Qin; You-Yi Dai; Liang-Fang Shen
Journal:  Chin J Cancer       Date:  2016-11-16

8.  Cervical nodal volume for prognostication and risk stratification of patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma, and implications on the TNM-staging system.

Authors:  Hui Yuan; Qi-Yong Ai; Dora Lai-Wan Kwong; Daniel Yee-Tak Fong; Ann D King; Varut Vardhanabhuti; Victor Ho-Fun Lee; Pek-Lan Khong
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Prognostic value of cervical nodal tumor volume in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Analysis of 1230 patients with positive cervical nodal metastasis.

Authors:  Fo-Ping Chen; Guan-Qun Zhou; Zhen-Yu Qi; Li Lin; Jiang Hu; Xiao-Ju Wang; Ying Sun
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Propensity score matching analysis of cisplatin-based concurrent chemotherapy in low risk nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the intensity-modulated radiotherapy era.

Authors:  Lu-Ning Zhang; Yuan-Hong Gao; Xiao-Wen Lan; Jie Tang; Zhen Su; Jun Ma; Wuguo Deng; Pu-Yun OuYang; Fang-Yun Xie
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2015-12-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.