PURPOSE: A postsurgical "stage-based" protocol for ependymoma was designed. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Children were given: (1) focal hyperfractionated radiotherapy (HFRT) if with no evidence of disease (NED), or (2) 4 courses with VEC followed by HFRT for residual disease (ED). HFRT dose was 70.4 Gy (1.1 Gy/fraction b.i.d.); VEC consisted of VCR 1.5 mg/m2 1/w, VP16 100 mg/m2/day x 3, CTX 3 g/m2 d 1. When feasible, second-look surgery was recommended. RESULTS: Sixty-three consecutive children were enrolled: 46 NED, 17 ED; the tumor was infratentorial in 47 and supratentorial in 16, with spinal metastasis in 1. Of NED patients, 35 of 46 have been treated with HFRT; 8 received conventionally fractionated radiotherapy, and 3 received no treatment. Of the 17 ED patients, 9 received VEC + HFRT; violations due to postsurgical morbidity were as follows: HFRT only (2), conventionally fractionated radiotherapy (3) + VEC (2), and no therapy (1). Objective responses to VEC were seen in 54%; objective responses to RT were seen in 75%. Overall survival and progression-free survival at 5 years for all 63 children were 75% and 56%, respectively; for the NED subgroup, 82% and 65%; and for the ED subgroup, 61% and 35%, respectively. All histologies were centrally reviewed. At multivariate analysis, grading, age, and site proved significant for prognosis. CONCLUSIONS: HFRT, despite the high total dose adopted, did not change the prognosis of childhood ependymoma as compared to historical series: New radiotherapeutic approaches are needed to improve local control. Future ependymoma strategies should consider grading when stratifying treatment indications.
PURPOSE: A postsurgical "stage-based" protocol for ependymoma was designed. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Children were given: (1) focal hyperfractionated radiotherapy (HFRT) if with no evidence of disease (NED), or (2) 4 courses with VEC followed by HFRT for residual disease (ED). HFRT dose was 70.4 Gy (1.1 Gy/fraction b.i.d.); VEC consisted of VCR 1.5 mg/m2 1/w, VP16 100 mg/m2/day x 3, CTX 3 g/m2 d 1. When feasible, second-look surgery was recommended. RESULTS: Sixty-three consecutive children were enrolled: 46 NED, 17 ED; the tumor was infratentorial in 47 and supratentorial in 16, with spinal metastasis in 1. Of NED patients, 35 of 46 have been treated with HFRT; 8 received conventionally fractionated radiotherapy, and 3 received no treatment. Of the 17 ED patients, 9 received VEC + HFRT; violations due to postsurgical morbidity were as follows: HFRT only (2), conventionally fractionated radiotherapy (3) + VEC (2), and no therapy (1). Objective responses to VEC were seen in 54%; objective responses to RT were seen in 75%. Overall survival and progression-free survival at 5 years for all 63 children were 75% and 56%, respectively; for the NED subgroup, 82% and 65%; and for the ED subgroup, 61% and 35%, respectively. All histologies were centrally reviewed. At multivariate analysis, grading, age, and site proved significant for prognosis. CONCLUSIONS:HFRT, despite the high total dose adopted, did not change the prognosis of childhood ependymoma as compared to historical series: New radiotherapeutic approaches are needed to improve local control. Future ependymoma strategies should consider grading when stratifying treatment indications.
Authors: Michael Safaee; Michael C Oh; Joseph M Kim; Derick Aranda; Phiroz E Tarapore; Tene A Cage; Nalin Gupta; Andrew T Parsa Journal: Childs Nerv Syst Date: 2013-05-16 Impact factor: 1.475
Authors: Martin Benesch; Martin Mynarek; Hendrik Witt; Monika Warmuth-Metz; Torsten Pietsch; Brigitte Bison; Stefan M Pfister; Kristian W Pajtler; Marcel Kool; Ulrich Schüller; Klaus Pietschmann; Björn-Ole Juhnke; Stephan Tippelt; Gudrun Fleischhack; Irene Schmid; Christof M Kramm; Peter Vorwerk; Andreas Beilken; Carl Friedrich Classen; Pablo Hernáiz Driever; Gabriele Kropshofer; Thomas Imschweiler; Andreas Lemmer; Rolf-Dieter Kortmann; Stefan Rutkowski; Katja von Hoff Journal: Oncologist Date: 2019-03-08
Authors: Thomas E Merchant; Chenghong Li; Xiaoping Xiong; Larry E Kun; Frederic A Boop; Robert A Sanford Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2009-03 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Eli T Sayegh; Derick Aranda; Joseph M Kim; Taemin Oh; Andrew T Parsa; Michael C Oh Journal: J Clin Neurosci Date: 2014-07-15 Impact factor: 1.961