Literature DB >> 15050072

Morbidity of harvesting of bone grafts from the iliac crest for preprosthetic augmentation procedures: a prospective study.

E Nkenke1, V Weisbach, E Winckler, P Kessler, S Schultze-Mosgau, J Wiltfang, F W Neukam.   

Abstract

It has been the aim of the present prospective clinical study to assess the morbidity following the harvest of bone from the anterior and posterior ilium in elective preprosthetic augmentations. Fifty consecutive healthy patients (30 female, 20 male, mean age 52.5+/-9.3 years, range 31 years to 65 years) underwent augmentations of implant sites by iliac crest bone grafts. The bone harvest was carried out in 25 cases from the anterior and in 25 cases from the posterior ilium. The superficial sensory function of the skin was determined quantitatively preoperatively, 7 and 30 days after surgery with the 'Pain and Thermal Sensitivity' Test (PATH Test). On the same occasions subjective pain on a visual analogue scale (VAS) and gait disturbances were documented. In the PATH Test, for the innervation areas of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN) and the superior and middle cluneal nerves (SMCN) a significant impairment of the superficial sensory function could be found after 1 week and a significant tendency towards recovery after 1 month (warm stimulus(FCNpreop) 37.9+/-3.0 degrees C, warm stimulus(LFCNday7): 38.6+/-3.2 degrees C, warm stimulus(LFCNday30): 37.9+/-2.9 degrees C, P(LFCNwarmpreop/day7)=0.023,P(LFCNwarmpreop/day30) =0.886, warm stimulus(SMCNpreop): 36.1+/-2.4 degrees C, warm stimulus(SMCNday7): 36.6+/-2.3 degrees C, warm stimulus(SMCNday30): 36.3+/-4.0 degrees C,P(SMCNwarmpreop/day7) <0.0005,P(SMCNwarmpreop/day30) =0.086). Gait disturbances were seen in seven patients after anterior and in three patients after posterior bone harvest 7 days after surgery (P(gaitdisturbanceanterior/posterior)=0.123). After 1 month none of the patients of both groups showed gait disturbances any longer. The maximum subjective pain level was found on the second postoperative day in both groups. It was significantly higher for the anterior approach (VAS(anteriorday2) 7.0+/-1.5, VAS(posteriorday2) 5.5+/-1.8,P(VASanterior/posteriorday2) =0.004). At day 7 and at day 30, the pain levels did no longer differ significantly (VAS(anteriorday7) 3.7+/-1.4, VAS(posteriorday7) 3.2+/-1.6,P(VASanterior/posteriorday7) =0.165, VAS(anteriorday30) 1.4+/-0.7, VAS(posteriorday30) 1.4+/-0.8,P(VASanterior/posteriorday30) =0.724). Because of the lower morbidity of bone harvest from the posterior ilium in the early postoperative phase compared to the anterior approach it seems that it should be preferred in elective augmentation procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15050072     DOI: 10.1054/ijom.2003.0465

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0901-5027            Impact factor:   2.789


  37 in total

1.  Guided Bone Regeneration of an Atrophic Mandible with a Heterologous Bone Block.

Authors:  Danilo Alessio Di Stefano; Gian Battista Greco; Francesco Riboli
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2015-05-01

Review 2.  [Bone harvesting from the iliac crest].

Authors:  M Jäger; B Westhoff; A Wild; R Krauspe
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 3.  [Regeneration instead of reparation: a critical review of the autogenous bone transplant as "golden standard" of reconstructive oral surgery].

Authors:  Hans-Henning Horch; Christoph Pautke
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  2006-07

4.  How can we optimize anterior iliac crest bone harvesting? An anatomical and radiological study.

Authors:  Mickaël Ropars; Alexandre Zadem; Xavier Morandi; Rajiv Kaila; Raphaël Guillin; Denis Huten
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-12-22       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  [Combined sinus lift procedure and lateral augmentation. A treatment concept for the surgical and prosthodontic rehabilitation of the extremely atrophic maxilla].

Authors:  D Weingart; R Bublitz; G Petrin; J Kälber; S Ingimarsson
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  2005-09

Review 6.  Collagen based barrier membranes for periodontal guided bone regeneration applications.

Authors:  Zeeshan Sheikh; Javairia Qureshi; Abdullah M Alshahrani; Heba Nassar; Yuichi Ikeda; Michael Glogauer; Bernhard Ganss
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 2.634

7.  In vitro evaluation of rhBMP-2-induced expression of VEGF in human adipose-derived stromal cells.

Authors:  Yi Yang; Gele Jin; Xin Cao; Peng Wang; Xinming Yang; Jiang Wu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-01-15

8.  Donor site morbidity following iliac crest bone harvesting for cervical fusion: a comparison between minimally invasive and open techniques.

Authors:  Raymond Pollock; Ilhan Alcelik; Chandra Bhatia; Graham Chuter; Kiran Lingutla; Chakravarty Budithi; Manoj Krishna
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-04-04       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Evaluation of morbidity associated with iliac crest harvest for alveolar cleft bone grafting.

Authors:  Sainath Matsa; Senthil Murugan; Kamal Kannadasan
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2011-06-09

10.  [Computer-assisted orbital floor reconstruction. Use of a CAD/CAM implant with intraoperative contact-free 3D endo- and exophthalmometry].

Authors:  T V Kühnel; E Vairaktaris; C Alexiou; K A Schlegel; F W Neukam; E Nkenke
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.284

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.