Literature DB >> 15049869

Quantitative phase amplitude microscopy IV: imaging thick specimens.

C J Bellair1, C L Curl, B E Allman, P J Harris, A Roberts, L M D Delbridge, K A Nugent.   

Abstract

The ability to image phase distributions with high spatial resolution is a key capability of microscopy systems. Consequently, the development and use of phase microscopy has been an important aspect of microscopy research and development. Most phase microscopy is based on a form of interference. Some phase imaging techniques, such as differential interference microscopy or phase microscopy, have a low coherence requirement, which enables high-resolution imaging but in effect prevents the acquisition of quantitative phase information. These techniques are therefore used mainly for phase visualization. On the other hand, interference microscopy and holography are able to yield quantitative phase measurements but cannot offer the highest resolution. A new approach to phase microscopy, quantitative phase-amplitude microscopy (QPAM) has recently been proposed that relies on observing the manner in which intensity images change with small defocuses and using these intensity changes to recover the phase. The method is easily understood when an object is thin, meaning its thickness is much less than the depth of field of the imaging system. However, in practice, objects will not often be thin, leading to the question of what precisely is being measured when QPAM is applied to a thick object. The optical transfer function formalism previously developed uses three-dimensional (3D) optical transfer functions under the Born approximation. In this paper we use the 3D optical transfer function approach of Streibl not for the analysis of 3D imaging methods, such as tomography, but rather for the problem of analysing 2D phase images of thick objects. We go on to test the theoretical predictions experimentally. The two are found to be in excellent agreement and we show that the 3D imaging properties of QPAM can be reliably predicted using the optical transfer function formalism.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15049869     DOI: 10.1111/j.0022-2720.2004.01302.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Microsc        ISSN: 0022-2720            Impact factor:   1.758


  6 in total

1.  Quantitative phase microscopy: a new tool for measurement of cell culture growth and confluency in situ.

Authors:  Claire L Curl; Trudi Harris; Peter J Harris; Brendan E Allman; Catherine J Bellair; Alastair G Stewart; Lea M D Delbridge
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  2004-02-17       Impact factor: 3.657

2.  Quantitative phase imaging of arthropods.

Authors:  Shamira Sridharan; Aron Katz; Felipe Soto-Adames; Gabriel Popescu
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.170

3.  Surface plasmon resonance microscopy: Achieving a quantitative optical response.

Authors:  Alexander W Peterson; Michael Halter; Anne L Plant; John T Elliott
Journal:  Rev Sci Instrum       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.523

4.  Correcting the Relative Bias of Light Obscuration and Flow Imaging Particle Counters.

Authors:  Dean C Ripple; Zhishang Hu
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 4.200

5.  Single shot laser writing with sub-nanosecond and nanosecond bursts of femtosecond pulses.

Authors:  Andrey Okhrimchuk; Sergey Fedotov; Ivan Glebov; Vladimir Sigaev; Peter Kazansky
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Plastic deformation as nature of femtosecond laser writing in YAG crystal.

Authors:  S S Fedotov; L N Butvina; A G Okhrimchuk
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.