Literature DB >> 15048089

Distinct functional domains of Nbs1 modulate the timing and magnitude of ATM activation after low doses of ionizing radiation.

Zuzana Horejsí1, Jacob Falck, Christopher J Bakkenist, Michael B Kastan, Jiri Lukas, Jiri Bartek.   

Abstract

The ATM kinase is a tumour suppressor and a key activator of genome integrity checkpoints in mammalian cells exposed to ionizing radiation (IR) and other insults that elicit DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). In response to IR, autophosphorylation on serine 1981 causes dissociation of ATM dimers and initiates cellular ATM kinase activity. Here, we show that the kinetics and magnitude of ATM Ser1981 phosphorylation after exposure of human fibroblasts to low doses (2 Gy) of IR are altered in cells deficient in Nbs1, a substrate of ATM and a component of the MRN (Mre11-Rad50-Nbs1) complex involved in processing/repair of DSBs and ATM-dependent cell cycle checkpoints. Timely phosphorylation of both ATM Ser1981 and the ATM substrate Smc1 after IR were rescued via retrovirally mediated reconstitution of Nbs1-deficient cells by wild-type Nbs1 or mutants of Nbs1 defective in the FHA domain or nonphosphorylatable by ATM, but not by Nbs1 lacking the Mre11-interaction domain. Our data indicate that apart from its role downstream of ATM in the DNA damage checkpoint network, the MRN complex serves also as a modulator/amplifier of ATM activity. Although not absolutely required for ATM activation, the MRN nuclease complex may help reach the threshold activity of ATM necessary for optimal genome maintenance and prevention of cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15048089     DOI: 10.1038/sj.onc.1207447

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncogene        ISSN: 0950-9232            Impact factor:   9.867


  43 in total

Review 1.  Hyperosmolality triggers oxidative damage in kidney cells.

Authors:  Dietmar Kültz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-06-15       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Phosphorylation of SMC1 is a critical downstream event in the ATM-NBS1-BRCA1 pathway.

Authors:  Risa Kitagawa; Christopher J Bakkenist; Peter J McKinnon; Michael B Kastan
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2004-06-02       Impact factor: 11.361

3.  ATM activation and its recruitment to damaged DNA require binding to the C terminus of Nbs1.

Authors:  Zhongsheng You; Charly Chahwan; Julie Bailis; Tony Hunter; Paul Russell
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.272

4.  DNA polymerase eta, the product of the xeroderma pigmentosum variant gene and a target of p53, modulates the DNA damage checkpoint and p53 activation.

Authors:  Gang Liu; Xinbin Chen
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.272

5.  Nbs1 is required for ATR-dependent phosphorylation events.

Authors:  Tom Stiff; Caroline Reis; Gemma K Alderton; Lisa Woodbine; Mark O'Driscoll; Penny A Jeggo
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2004-12-16       Impact factor: 11.598

6.  Distinct roles of the ATR kinase and the Mre11-Rad50-Nbs1 complex in the maintenance of chromosomal stability in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Simon Amiard; Cyril Charbonnel; Elisabeth Allain; Annie Depeiges; Charles I White; Maria Eugenia Gallego
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 11.277

7.  Competition effect in DNA damage response.

Authors:  Christoph Greubel; Volker Hable; Guido A Drexler; Andreas Hauptner; Steffen Dietzel; Hilmar Strickfaden; Iris Baur; Reiner Krücken; Thomas Cremer; Günther Dollinger; Anna A Friedl
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2008-07-23       Impact factor: 1.925

8.  MDC1 regulates intra-S-phase checkpoint by targeting NBS1 to DNA double-strand breaks.

Authors:  Liming Wu; Kuntian Luo; Zhenkun Lou; Junjie Chen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-08-04       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  The Nijmegen breakage syndrome gene and its role in genome stability.

Authors:  Kenta Iijima; Kenshi Komatsu; Shinya Matsuura; Hiroshi Tauchi
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2004-07-17       Impact factor: 4.316

Review 10.  DNA resection in eukaryotes: deciding how to fix the break.

Authors:  Pablo Huertas
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 15.369

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.