Literature DB >> 15047522

Pharmacodynamics of moxifloxacin and levofloxacin at simulated epithelial lining fluid drug concentrations against Streptococcus pneumoniae.

Naomi R Florea1, Pamela R Tessier, Cuilian Zhang, Charles H Nightingale, David P Nicolau.   

Abstract

Recent clinical failures associated with levofloxacin treatment for Streptococcus pneumoniae infections and growing evidence of frequent mutations in the isolate population have led to increased concerns regarding fluoroquinolone resistance. Our objective was to characterize the efficacies of levofloxacin and moxifloxacin against various genotypes of S. pneumoniae after simulated bronchopulmonary exposures. An in vitro model was used to simulate a levofloxacin concentration of 500 mg and a moxifloxacin concentration of 400 mg, which were previously determined to be the concentrations in the epithelial lining fluid of older adults receiving once-daily dosing. The effects of the drugs were tested against six S. pneumoniae containing various mutations. Bacterial density and resistance were quantitatively assessed over 48 h. The S. pneumoniae isolate with no mutation displayed a 4-log reduction in CFU after treatment with both agents and did not develop resistance. Isolates containing the parC or parE mutation or both mutations regrew and developed resistance when they were exposed to levofloxacin, despite an unbound area under the concentration-time curve (AUC):MIC ratio of approximately 100. When the isolate containing the parC and gyrA mutations was exposed to levofloxacin, there was a half-log reduction in the number of CFU compared to that for the control, but the isolate subsequently regrew. Likewise, levofloxacin did not kill the isolate containing the parC, gyrA, and parE mutations. Moxifloxacin sustained the killing of all bacterial isolates tested without the development of resistance. Levofloxacin did not sustain bacterial killing and did not prevent the emergence of further resistance in mutants with the parC or parE mutation or both mutations, even though an unbound AUC:MIC ratio for exposure well above the breakpoint of 30 to 40 established in the literature for S. pneumoniae was maintained. Moxifloxacin was effective against all isolates tested, despite the presence of isolates with two- and three-step mutations, for which the MICs were increased.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15047522      PMCID: PMC375308          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.48.4.1215-1221.2004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  28 in total

Review 1.  Current diagnosis and management of sinusitis.

Authors:  L R Willett; J L Carson; J W Williams
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Pharmacodynamics of levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin against Streptococcus pneumoniae.

Authors:  P D Lister; C C Sanders
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 5.790

Review 3.  Antibacterial therapy for lower respiratory tract infections in adults: a review.

Authors:  F M LaForce
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 9.079

4.  Pharmacodynamic comparisons of levofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, and ampicillin against Streptococcus pneumoniae in an in vitro model of infection.

Authors:  M K Lacy; W Lu; X Xu; P R Tessier; D P Nicolau; R Quintiliani; C H Nightingale
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Pharmacodynamic characterization of efflux and topoisomerase IV-mediated fluoroquinolone resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae.

Authors:  Karl J Madaras-Kelly; Christopher Daniels; Marissa Hegbloom; Michelle Thompson
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 5.790

6.  Efficacy and pharmacodynamics of simulated human-like treatment with levofloxacin on experimental pneumonia induced with penicillin-resistant pneumococci with various susceptibilities to fluoroquinolones.

Authors:  Delphine Croisier; Pascal Chavanet; Catherine Lequeu; Abderrahmane Ahanou; Anne Nierlich; Catherine Neuwirth; Lionel Piroth; Michel Duong; Marielle Buisson; Henri Portier
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.790

7.  Antimicrobial susceptibility of community-acquired respiratory tract pathogens in North America in 1999-2000: findings of the PROTEKT surveillance study.

Authors:  Daryl Hoban; Ken Waites; David Felmingham
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.803

8.  Steady-state intrapulmonary concentrations of moxifloxacin, levofloxacin, and azithromycin in older adults.

Authors:  Blair Capitano; Holly M Mattoes; Eric Shore; Aidan O'Brien; Sidney Braman; Chistina Sutherland; David P Nicolau
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 9.410

9.  Absorption of ciprofloxacin in patients with diabetic gastroparesis.

Authors:  M N Marangos; A T Skoutelis; C H Nightingale; Z Zhu; A G Psyrogiannis; D P Nicolau; H P Bassaris; R Quintiliani
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Assessment of effects of protein binding on daptomycin and vancomycin killing of Staphylococcus aureus by using an in vitro pharmacodynamic model.

Authors:  M W Garrison; K Vance-Bryan; T A Larson; J P Toscano; J C Rotschafer
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 5.191

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Optimising dosing strategies of antibacterials utilising pharmacodynamic principles: impact on the development of resistance.

Authors:  C Andrew DeRyke; Su Young Lee; Joseph L Kuti; David P Nicolau
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  In vivo measurement of levofloxacin penetration into lung tissue after cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Doris Hutschala; Keso Skhirtladze; Andreas Zuckermann; Wilfried Wisser; Peter Jaksch; Bernhard Xaver Mayer-Helm; Heinz Burgmann; Ernst Wolner; Markus Müller; Edda M Tschernko
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 3.  Penetration of anti-infective agents into pulmonary epithelial lining fluid: focus on antibacterial agents.

Authors:  Keith A Rodvold; Jomy M George; Liz Yoo
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 6.447

4.  Fluoroquinolone resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae: area under the concentration-time curve/MIC ratio and resistance development with gatifloxacin, gemifloxacin, levofloxacin, and moxifloxacin.

Authors:  Kerry L LaPlante; Michael J Rybak; Brian Tsuji; Thomas P Lodise; Glenn W Kaatz
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2007-02-12       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 5.  Moxifloxacin: a review of its use in the management of bacterial infections.

Authors:  Gillian M Keating; Lesley J Scott
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  Pharmacodynamic assessment based on mutant prevention concentrations of fluoroquinolones to prevent the emergence of resistant mutants of Streptococcus pneumoniae.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Homma; Toshihiko Hori; Giichi Sugimori; Yoshinori Yamano
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2007-07-30       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 7.  Predicting Antimicrobial Activity at the Target Site: Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Indices versus Time-Kill Approaches.

Authors:  Wisse van Os; Markus Zeitlinger
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-04
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.