Literature DB >> 15047084

Choosing where to deliver: decision criteria among women with low-risk pregnancies in France.

E Combier1, J Zeitlin, N de Courcel, S Vasseur, A Lalouf, J M Amat-Roze, G de Pouvourville.   

Abstract

As in the rest of Europe, the supply of maternity hospitals has progressively decreased over the past few decades in France. An understanding of user choice criteria is important to help health planners reorganize obstetrical services and to predict changes in utilization patterns in response to supply changes. The objectives were to understand the criteria that women use to select their maternity hospital in France and to analyse the relation to individual and community characteristics. A survey of 536 recently delivered women with low-risk pregnancies explored the factors motivating user choice in three territories with distinct geographical and health service supply characteristics: four districts in Burgundy, two districts in Pays de la Loire, and the district of Seine-Saint-Denis in Ile-de-France. Women were asked to select a principal choice criterion. Their responses were grouped into categories: Accessibility/proximity, reputation of the establishment among users, advice of treating physician, technical quality and cost. Accessibility and proximity were the most selected criteria (33%), followed by the reputation of the maternity (29%), technical quality (15%) and advice of treating physician (13%). Age, parity and education influenced choice criteria. After controlling for individual determinants, region of residence was highly related to choice criteria; women living in Burgundy were more likely to select an establishment based on proximity, in Seine-Saint-Denis women were more likely to follow the advice of their physician, and in Pays de la Loire, more likely to base their decisions on the reputation of the establishment. The association between choice criteria and community characteristics could explain the failure of previous models to predict behaviour in different contexts. It is important to carry out local surveys of user perceptions before restructuring in order to take into consideration women's opinions on their future places of delivery and to refine geographic models.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15047084     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2003.08.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  7 in total

1.  Health-care availability, preference, and distance for women in urban Bo, Sierra Leone.

Authors:  Lila C Fleming; Rashid Ansumana; Alfred S Bockarie; Joel D Alejandre; Karen K Owen; Umaru Bangura; David H Jimmy; Kevin M Curtin; David A Stenger; Kathryn H Jacobsen
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 3.380

2.  Delivering information: a descriptive study of Australian women's information needs for decision-making about birth facility.

Authors:  Rachel Thompson; Aleena M Wojcieszek
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 3.007

3.  Freestanding midwifery units versus obstetric units: does the effect of place of birth differ with level of social disadvantage?

Authors:  Charlotte Overgaard; Morten Fenger-Grøn; Jane Sandall
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  Patients' experience of choosing an outpatient clinic in one county in Denmark: results of a patient survey.

Authors:  Hans O Birk; Rikke Gut; Lars O Henriksen
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-10-10       Impact factor: 2.655

5.  Choice in maternity care: associations with unit supply, geographic accessibility and user characteristics.

Authors:  Hugo Pilkington; Béatrice Blondel; Nicolas Drewniak; Jennifer Zeitlin
Journal:  Int J Health Geogr       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 3.918

Review 6.  Determinants of patient choice of healthcare providers: a scoping review.

Authors:  Aafke Victoor; Diana M J Delnoij; Roland D Friele; Jany J D J M Rademakers
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 2.908

7.  Bypassing health facilities in rural Mozambique: spatial, institutional, and individual determinants.

Authors:  Jing Yao; Victor Agadjanian
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-12-29       Impact factor: 2.655

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.