Literature DB >> 15046227

Barriers to endoscopic colorectal cancer screening: are women different from men?

Francis A Farraye1, Mei Wong, Shelley Hurwitz, Elaine Puleo, Karen Emmons, Michael B Wallace, Robert H Fletcher.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The goals of this study were to compare women and men's understanding of screening flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) and to identify predictors of endoscopic colorectal cancer (CRC) screening.
METHODS: We mailed a 36-item questionnaire to asymptomatic patients aged 50 years or older who were scheduled for routine health assessments at a large multispecialty health-care group. Data collection included demographics, health behaviors, psychosocial factors, and CRC screening compliance. We followed participants for 1 year and assessed completion of endoscopic CRC screening. Both cross-sectional results examining previous screening and prospective results examining screening 1 year later were evaluated.
RESULTS: 554 (54%) of 998 patients responded to the survey. Responses of 13 patients were excluded in the analyses due to unverifiable screening outcome. The majority of the respondents were white, and their average age was 62 years. Women reported significantly more embarrassment and fear about having FS than men. Women were more willing to consider having a FS if a female endoscopist performed the procedure. Of the 334 participants who were eligible to have endoscopic CRC screening, 53 (16%) had the procedure within a year. The odds of having the endoscopic procedures increased with the length of time the patients were under the care of their primary care providers and how strongly patients believed that one should have an FS even without symptoms.
CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest some unique gender-specific attitudes and beliefs that act as potential barriers for CRC screening and further support the important role of primary care providers in facilitating timely completion of screening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15046227     DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.04045.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  39 in total

Review 1.  Individual-level factors in colorectal cancer screening: a review of the literature on the relation of individual-level health behavior constructs and screening behavior.

Authors:  Marc T Kiviniemi; Alyssa Bennett; Marie Zaiter; James R Marshall
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 3.894

2.  Could gastrointestinal disorders differ in two close but divergent social environments?

Authors:  Ewa Grodzinsky; Claes Hallert; Tomas Faresjö; Elisabet Bergfors; Ashild Olsen Faresjö
Journal:  Int J Health Geogr       Date:  2012-02-06       Impact factor: 3.918

3.  Predictors of compliance with free endoscopic colorectal cancer screening in uninsured adults.

Authors:  Joseph C Anderson; Richard H Fortinsky; Alison Kleppinger; Amanda B Merz-Beyus; Charles G Huntington; Suzanne Lagarde
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2011-04-16       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Patients' experience of screening CT colonography with reduced and full bowel preparation in a randomised trial.

Authors:  Lapo Sali; Leonardo Ventura; Grazia Grazzini; Alessandra Borgheresi; Silvia Delsanto; Massimo Falchini; Beatrice Mallardi; Paola Mantellini; Stefano Milani; Stefano Pallanti; Marco Zappa; Mario Mascalchi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Gender disparities in colorectal cancer screening: true or false?

Authors:  Rachel A Callcut; Stephanie Kaufman; Robert Stone-Newsom; Patrick Remington; David Mahvi
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Colorectal cancer screening among obese versus non-obese patients in primary care practices.

Authors:  Jeanne M Ferrante; Pamela Ohman-Strickland; Shawna V Hudson; Karissa A Hahn; John G Scott; Benjamin F Crabtree
Journal:  Cancer Detect Prev       Date:  2006-10-25

7.  Barriers to colorectal cancer screening among women in rural central Pennsylvania: primary care physicians' perspective.

Authors:  Lara A Rosenwasser; Jennifer S McCall-Hosenfeld; Carol S Weisman; Marianne M Hillemeier; Amanda N Perry; Cynthia H Chuang
Journal:  Rural Remote Health       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 1.759

8.  Colorectal cancer screening in primary care: theoretical model to improve prevalence in the practice partner research network.

Authors:  Lynne S Nemeth; Ruth G Jenkins; Paul J Nietert; Steven M Ornstein
Journal:  Health Promot Pract       Date:  2009-03-18

9.  Colorectal cancer in Italy: a review of current national and regional practice on screening and treatment.

Authors:  Cristina Masseria
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2010-01

10.  Preferences for colorectal cancer screening strategies: a discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  L Hol; E W de Bekker-Grob; L van Dam; B Donkers; E J Kuipers; J D F Habbema; E W Steyerberg; M E van Leerdam; M L Essink-Bot
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-03-02       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.