Literature DB >> 15045200

[Extensive reconstruction of the acetabular dome after redisplacement of an acetabular fracture. Case report].

A Gänsslen1, T Pohlemann, C Krettek.   

Abstract

Anatomical reconstruction and stable internal fixation is the treatment of choice in displaced acetabular fractures. Marginal impaction zones are of negative prognostic value. They are normally treated with a cancellous bone graft from the greater trochanter. In the presented case, a secondarily failed acetabular reconstruction with redisplacement of the acetabular dome was treated with several corticocancellous blocks filled in the dome defect. In this case, a comminuted area and secondary displacement could be successfully treated with anatomical reconstruction. This resulted in joint congruency and an acceptable long-term result after 16 years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15045200     DOI: 10.1007/s00113-003-0706-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Unfallchirurg        ISSN: 0177-5537            Impact factor:   1.000


  13 in total

1.  Displaced acetabular fractures.

Authors:  J M Matta; P O Merritt
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Clinical failure after posterior wall acetabular fractures: the influence of initial fracture patterns.

Authors:  A M Saterbak; J L Marsh; J V Nepola; E A Brandser; T Turbett
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.512

3.  Injury of the sciatic nerve associated with acetabular fracture.

Authors:  P R Fassler; M F Swiontkowski; A W Kilroy; M L Routt
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Open reduction and internal fixation of fractures of the acetabulum. Results in 163 fractures.

Authors:  K A Mayo
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Heterotopic ossification following operative treatment of acetabular fracture. An analysis of risk factors.

Authors:  N Ghalambor; J M Matta; L Bernstein
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Arthrosis after surgically treated acetabular fractures. A retrospective study of 60 cases.

Authors:  B Ragnarsson; B Mjöberg
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1992-10

7.  Acetabulum fractures: classification and management.

Authors:  E Letournel
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Complex acetabular fractures: a transtrochanteric lateral surgical approach.

Authors:  J Senegas; G Liorzou; M Yates
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Fractures of the acetabulum. A retrospective analysis.

Authors:  J M Matta; L M Anderson; H C Epstein; P Hendricks
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Fractures of the acetabulum. Early results of a prospective study.

Authors:  J M Matta; D K Mehne; R Roffi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.