Literature DB >> 15044881

Optimal number of EUS-guided fine needle passes needed to obtain a correct diagnosis.

Julia Kim LeBlanc1, Donato Ciaccia, Mohammed T Al-Assi, Kevin McGrath, Tom Imperiale, Liang-Che Tao, Steve Vallery, John DeWitt, Stuart Sherman, Edith Collins.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The immediate assistance of a cytologist during EUS-guided FNA is not universal. The optimal number of fine needle passes during EUS-guided FNA has not been determined in a prospective study. The aim of this study was to determine the optimal number of passes required to obtain a correct diagnosis.
METHODS: Seven or more passes were made with a fine needle into a variety of lesions during EUS-guided FNA. Adequacy of the aspirate, diagnosis, and a "certainty score" were recorded after each pass and interpreted sequentially by a cytopathologist. Surgical histopathology and 1-year clinical follow-up were used as reference standards. The percentage of correctly diagnosed cases was calculated and stratified according to organ, disease group, and EUS characteristics of the lesion.
RESULTS: Lesions from 95 patients were categorized into the following locations: pancreas, lymph node, and miscellaneous. The sensitivity and specificity for 7 passes from the pancreas and miscellaneous lesion groups were, respectively, 83% and 100%. The sensitivity and specificity for 5 passes from the lymph node group were, respectively, 77% and 100%.
CONCLUSIONS: During EUS-guided FNA, at least 7 passes with a fine needle into pancreatic and miscellaneous lesions, and 5 passes into lymph nodes are needed to ensure a high degree of certainty for making a correct diagnosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15044881     DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5107(03)02863-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  85 in total

1.  Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration with 22- and 25-gauge needles in the same patients.

Authors:  Mitsuhiro Kida; Masao Araki; Shiro Miyazawa; Hiroko Ikeda; Miyoko Takezawa; Hidehiko Kikuchi; Maya Watanabe; Hiroshi Imaizumi; Wasaburo Koizumi
Journal:  J Interv Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-07-01

2.  Fine needle aspiration at endoscopic ultrasound with a novel side-port needle: a pilot experience.

Authors:  Arthur Kaffes; Crispin Corte
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 4.409

3.  Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine needle aspiration: Relatively low sensitivity in the endosonographer population.

Authors:  Jean-Marc Dumonceau; Thibaud Koessler; Jeanin E van Hooft; Paul Fockens
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-05-21       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Diagnosis of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and the role of endoscopic ultrasound.

Authors:  Linda S Lee
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2010-08

5.  Contrast enhanced endoscopic ultrasound: More than just a fancy Doppler.

Authors:  Rachid M Mohamed; Brian M Yan
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2010-07-16

6.  Endosonographer's macroscopic evaluation of EUS-FNAB specimens after interactive cytopathologic training: a single-center prospective validation cohort study.

Authors:  Hong Joo Kim; Yoon Suk Jung; Jung Ho Park; Dong Il Park; Yong Kyun Cho; Chong Il Sohn; Woo Kyu Jeon; Byung Ik Kim; Kyu Yong Choi; Seungho Ryu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Comparison of 22G reverse-beveled versus standard needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic lesions.

Authors:  Abdullah Alatawi; Frédéric Beuvon; Sophie Grabar; Sarah Leblanc; Stanislas Chaussade; Benoit Terris; Maximilien Barret; Frédéric Prat
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 4.623

8.  Quality indicators for EUS.

Authors:  Sachin Wani; Michael B Wallace; Jonathan Cohen; Irving M Pike; Douglas G Adler; Michael L Kochman; John G Lieb; Walter G Park; Maged K Rizk; Mandeep S Sawhney; Nicholas J Shaheen; Jeffrey L Tokar
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 10.864

9.  Does onsite cytotechnology evaluation improve the accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy?

Authors:  Fahad Alsohaibani; Safwat Girgis; Gurpal Singh Sandha
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.522

10.  Endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration characteristics of primary adenocarcinoma versus other malignant neoplasms of the pancreas.

Authors:  Veronika Gagovic; Bret J Spier; Ryan J DeLee; Courtney Barancin; Mary Lindstrom; Michael Einstein; Siobhan Byrne; Josephine Harter; Rashmi Agni; Patrick R Pfau; Terrence J Frick; Anurag Soni; Deepak V Gopal
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.522

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.