BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C is a major public health problem of increasing importance among injecting drug users, among whom screening has been proposed. We therefore estimated the cost utility of screening for hepatitis C infection among people with a history of injecting drug use in contact with drug misuse services. METHODS: A spreadsheet-based model of screening using ELISA followed by polymerase chain reaction tests and treatment using combination therapy with interferon alpha and ribavirin was developed. Parameters were informed by literature review, expert opinion and a survey of current screening practice in England. A range of one-way sensitivity analyses were carried out to explore uncertainty in the results for cost effectiveness. RESULTS: Screening for HCV is likely to yield benefits in the population concerned at around 28,000 pounds per quality adjusted life year. This estimate is reasonably stable when explored in extensive one-way sensitivity analysis but appeared sensitive to the proportion of HCV positive people who accept biopsy or treatment and the utility gains associated with successful drug treatment. Important other areas of uncertainty include the effects of mortality from other causes on the cost effectiveness of screening in this population and the time at which symptoms would have led to presentation in the absence of a screening programme. CONCLUSION: Screening for HCV in this population is moderately cost effective, although some caution must remain in accepting this estimate given the current uncertainties in this field, and further research is required.
BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C is a major public health problem of increasing importance among injecting drug users, among whom screening has been proposed. We therefore estimated the cost utility of screening for hepatitis C infection among people with a history of injecting drug use in contact with drug misuse services. METHODS: A spreadsheet-based model of screening using ELISA followed by polymerase chain reaction tests and treatment using combination therapy with interferon alpha and ribavirin was developed. Parameters were informed by literature review, expert opinion and a survey of current screening practice in England. A range of one-way sensitivity analyses were carried out to explore uncertainty in the results for cost effectiveness. RESULTS: Screening for HCV is likely to yield benefits in the population concerned at around 28,000 pounds per quality adjusted life year. This estimate is reasonably stable when explored in extensive one-way sensitivity analysis but appeared sensitive to the proportion of HCV positive people who accept biopsy or treatment and the utility gains associated with successful drug treatment. Important other areas of uncertainty include the effects of mortality from other causes on the cost effectiveness of screening in this population and the time at which symptoms would have led to presentation in the absence of a screening programme. CONCLUSION: Screening for HCV in this population is moderately cost effective, although some caution must remain in accepting this estimate given the current uncertainties in this field, and further research is required.
Authors: Ava John-Baptiste; Man Wah Yeung; Victoria Leung; Gabrielle van der Velde; Murray Krahn Journal: Pharmacoeconomics Date: 2012-11-01 Impact factor: 4.981
Authors: Natasha K Martin; Peter Vickerman; Iain F Brew; Joan Williamson; Alec Miners; William L Irving; Sushma Saksena; Sharon J Hutchinson; Sema Mandal; Eamonn O'Moore; Matthew Hickman Journal: Hepatology Date: 2016-03-22 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Lauren E Cipriano; Gregory S Zaric; Mark Holodniy; Eran Bendavid; Douglas K Owens; Margaret L Brandeau Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-09-18 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Víctor Granados-García; Ana M Contreras; Carmen García-Peña; Guillermo Salinas-Escudero; Hla-Hla Thein; Yvonne N Flores Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-05-09 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Natasha K Martin; Peter Vickerman; Gregory J Dore; Jason Grebely; Alec Miners; John Cairns; Graham R Foster; Sharon J Hutchinson; David J Goldberg; Thomas C S Martin; Mary Ramsay; Matthew Hickman Journal: J Hepatol Date: 2016-02-08 Impact factor: 25.083
Authors: Natasha K Martin; Matthew Hickman; Alec Miners; Sharon J Hutchinson; Avril Taylor; Peter Vickerman Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2013-08-13 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Susan J M Hahné; Irene K Veldhuijzen; Lucas Wiessing; Tek-Ang Lim; Mika Salminen; Marita van de Laar Journal: BMC Infect Dis Date: 2013-04-18 Impact factor: 3.090