Literature DB >> 15043833

Genome size: does bigger mean worse?

Brian Charlesworth1, Nick Barton.   

Abstract

Genome sizes vary enormously. This variation in DNA content correlates with effective population size, suggesting that deleterious additions to the genome can accumulate in small populations. On this view, the increased complexity of biological functions associated with large genomes partly reflects evolutionary degeneration.

Mesh：

Substances：

Year:  2004        PMID： 15043833     DOI： 10.1016/j.cub.2004.02.054

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN： 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  26 in total

Review 1.  Male germline control of transposable elements.

Authors:  Jianqiang Bao; Wei Yan
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 4.285

2.  The consequences of genetic drift for bacterial genome complexity.

Authors:  Chih-Horng Kuo; Nancy A Moran; Howard Ochman
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2009-06-05       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 3.  Co-evolution between transposable elements and their hosts: a major factor in genome size evolution?

Authors:  J Arvid Ågren; Stephen I Wright
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 5.239

4.  Pervasive epigenetic effects of Drosophila euchromatic transposable elements impact their evolution.

Authors:  Yuh Chwen G Lee; Gary H Karpen
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 8.140

5.  Why genes overlap in viruses.

Authors:  Nicola Chirico; Alberto Vianelli; Robert Belshaw
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Did genetic drift drive increases in genome complexity?

Authors:  Kenneth D Whitney; Theodore Garland
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2010-08-26       Impact factor: 5.917

7.  Hawaiian Drosophila genomes: size variation and evolutionary expansions.

Authors:  Elysse M Craddock; Joseph G Gall; Mark Jonas
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 1.082

8.  Selection on amino acid substitutions in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  John Paul Foxe; Vaqaar-un-Nisa Dar; Honggang Zheng; Magnus Nordborg; Brandon S Gaut; Stephen I Wright
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2008-04-04       Impact factor: 16.240

9.  Genome size correlates with reproductive fitness in seed beetles.

Authors:  Göran Arnqvist; Ahmed Sayadi; Elina Immonen; Cosima Hotzy; Daniel Rankin; Midori Tuda; Carl E Hjelmen; J Spencer Johnston
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Genome architecture and social evolution.

Authors:  Sandra M Rehan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 11.205
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.