BACKGROUND: RBCT (RBCT) requirements of stem cell transplant (SCT) recipients are often substantial and may be related to transplant type. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: An analysis was done of RBCT requirements and Hb recovery kinetic in the first 60 days after HLA-identical sibling allogeneic SCT in a series of 110 consecutive patients treated for various malignant diagnoses. Patients were prepared with either an antithymocyte globulin (ATG) and reduced intensity chemotherapy-based conditioning (RIC) (n=64) or a myeloablative conditioning regimens (MAC; n=46). Patients received marrow (n=64) or PBPCs (n=46). RESULTS: Overall, intensity of conditioning regimen (RIC vs. MAC; p=0.0005) and graft source (PBPC vs. marrow; p<0.0001) independently predicted RBCT requirements. Hb recovery was accelerated after RIC when compared to MAC allo-SCT (p=0.02). In RIC patients, RBCTs were inversely correlated to Hb level before conditioning (p<0.0001) and the dose of ATG (p=0.009). Moreover, Hb level before allo-SCT significantly influenced Hb recovery kinetic after RIC but had no impact on RBCT requirements and Hb recovery after MAC. CONCLUSION: Thus, RIC conditioning creates a different pattern of erythropoiesis recovery as compared to a MAC regimen and suggest a need for studies aimed at further reducing RBCT and accelerating Hb recovery.
BACKGROUND: RBCT (RBCT) requirements of stem cell transplant (SCT) recipients are often substantial and may be related to transplant type. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: An analysis was done of RBCT requirements and Hb recovery kinetic in the first 60 days after HLA-identical sibling allogeneic SCT in a series of 110 consecutive patients treated for various malignant diagnoses. Patients were prepared with either an antithymocyte globulin (ATG) and reduced intensity chemotherapy-based conditioning (RIC) (n=64) or a myeloablative conditioning regimens (MAC; n=46). Patients received marrow (n=64) or PBPCs (n=46). RESULTS: Overall, intensity of conditioning regimen (RIC vs. MAC; p=0.0005) and graft source (PBPC vs. marrow; p<0.0001) independently predicted RBCT requirements. Hb recovery was accelerated after RIC when compared to MAC allo-SCT (p=0.02). In RIC patients, RBCTs were inversely correlated to Hb level before conditioning (p<0.0001) and the dose of ATG (p=0.009). Moreover, Hb level before allo-SCT significantly influenced Hb recovery kinetic after RIC but had no impact on RBCT requirements and Hb recovery after MAC. CONCLUSION: Thus, RIC conditioning creates a different pattern of erythropoiesis recovery as compared to a MAC regimen and suggest a need for studies aimed at further reducing RBCT and accelerating Hb recovery.
Authors: Zejing Wang; Mohamed L Sorror; Wendy Leisenring; Gary Schoch; David G Maloney; Brenda M Sandmaier; Rainer Storb Journal: Br J Haematol Date: 2010-01-11 Impact factor: 6.998
Authors: Linda M Griffith; Mark VanRaden; A John Barrett; Richard W Childs; Daniel H Fowler; Elizabeth M Kang; John F Tisdale; Harvey G Klein; David F Stroncek Journal: Transfusion Date: 2018-10-26 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: Erik G J von Asmuth; Alexander B Mohseny; Hein Putter; Marco W Schilham; Arjan C Lankester Journal: Front Pediatr Date: 2020-11-30 Impact factor: 3.418