Literature DB >> 15043327

Screening preferences for colorectal cancer: a patient demographic study.

Rafiq A Sheikh1, Sheela Kapre, Olga M Calof, Coburn Ward, Ashu Raina.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related death. Screening for colorectal cancer is a rational and cost-effective strategy for reducing the incidence of colorectal cancer and related mortality. Despite endorsement by academic and health care organizations, patient awareness and compliance with screening is low, partly because of patient-related barriers to screening.
METHODS: A convenience sample of adults attending the internal medicine and family practice clinics of a community teaching hospital was studied. A description of fecal occult blood testing (FOBT), sigmoidoscopy, and colonoscopy procedures was given in a packet along with a questionnaire. The questionnaire focused on screening procedures followed in our hospital (i.e., yearly FOBT and sigmoidoscopy every 5 years or colonoscopy every 10 years for average-risk individuals).
RESULTS: Of the 193 patients who responded, 55% preferred sigmoidoscopy and FOBT, 29% chose colonoscopy, and 16% wanted no screening. Those with knowledge of someone with colon cancer or colon polyps reported a significantly higher preference for screening than those without such knowledge. Catholics were most likely to prefer no screening compared with non-Catholics. Ex-smokers (compared with all others) were more likely to want screening. Catholics were least likely to want colonoscopy. Patients with previous experience of colorectal screening preferred future screening. Those preferring no screening were significantly younger than those who expressed a preference for screening.
CONCLUSION: The results of this study demonstrate diversity in patient choices for colorectal cancer screening. A focus on people's preferences rather than on the test itself may help develop and target appropriate intervention for prevention of colorectal cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15043327     DOI: 10.1097/01.SMJ.0000078619.39604.3D

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  South Med J        ISSN: 0038-4348            Impact factor:   0.954


  19 in total

1.  Colonoscopist and primary care physician supply and disparities in colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Jaime Benarroch-Gampel; Kristin M Sheffield; Yu-Li Lin; Yong-Fang Kuo; James S Goodwin; Taylor S Riall
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Surgeon-initiated screening colonoscopy program based on SAGES and ASCRS recommendations in a general surgery practice.

Authors:  E A Goldenberg; L Khaitan; I-P Huang; C D Smith; E Lin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-05-02       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Predictors of compliance with free endoscopic colorectal cancer screening in uninsured adults.

Authors:  Joseph C Anderson; Richard H Fortinsky; Alison Kleppinger; Amanda B Merz-Beyus; Charles G Huntington; Suzanne Lagarde
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2011-04-16       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  A framework for evaluating the cost-effectiveness of patient decision aids: A case study using colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Scott B Cantor; Tanya Rajan; Suzanne K Linder; Robert J Volk
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 4.018

5.  The impact of a novel computer-based decision aid on shared decision making for colorectal cancer screening: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Paul C Schroy; Karen Emmons; Ellen Peters; Julie T Glick; Patricia A Robinson; Maria A Lydotes; Shamini Mylvanaman; Stephen Evans; Christine Chaisson; Michael Pignone; Marianne Prout; Peter Davidson; Timothy C Heeren
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2010-05-18       Impact factor: 2.583

6.  Factors Associated with Colorectal Cancer Screening among Younger African American Men: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Charles R Rogers; Patricia Goodson; Margaret J Foster
Journal:  J Health Dispar Res Pract       Date:  2015

7.  Screening preferences of patients at familial risk of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Paul C Schroy Iii; Julie T Glick; Patricia A Robinson; Timothy Heeren
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2007-04-03       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  Cost-effectiveness of a standard intervention versus a navigated intervention on colorectal cancer screening use in primary care.

Authors:  David R Lairson; Melissa Dicarlo; Ashish A Deshmuk; Heather B Fagan; Randa Sifri; Nora Katurakes; James Cocroft; Jocelyn Sendecki; Heidi Swan; Sally W Vernon; Ronald E Myers
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Colorectal cancer: epidemiology, risk factors, and health services.

Authors:  Farin Amersi; Michelle Agustin; Clifford Y Ko
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2005-08

10.  Community-based preferences for stool cards versus colonoscopy in colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Ann C DeBourcy; Scott Lichtenberger; Susanne Felton; Kiel T Butterfield; Dennis J Ahnen; Thomas D Denberg
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.