Literature DB >> 15043303

Clinicopathologic analysis of early-stage sporadic ovarian carcinoma.

Mario M Leitao1, Jeff Boyd, Amanda Hummer, Narciso Olvera, Crispinita D Arroyo, Ennapadam Venkatraman, Rebecca N Baergen, Don S Dizon, Richard R Barakat, Robert A Soslow.   

Abstract

The reported experience with early-stage (FIGO stage I/II) ovarian carcinoma (OC) is limited given that the majority of women with OC are diagnosed at an advanced stage. There has not been an extensive review of these tumors, and since the pathologic criteria differentiating invasive and borderline tumors have evolved over time, the issue of whether a proportion of these tumors should be reclassified has not been addressed. We identified patients with stage I/II invasive OC who underwent primary surgical management at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center from 1980 to 2000. Patients known to have a BRCA mutation or a family history of breast/ovarian cancer were excluded. Hematoxylin and eosin slide review, blinded to clinical outcomes, using current diagnostic criteria for ovarian carcinomas and borderline ovarian tumors, was performed. Progression-free survival (PFS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) were estimated and compared. Hematoxylin and eosin slides were reviewed for 140 of the 145 patients identified. The diagnosis was changed to borderline (low malignant potential) in 41 cases (29.3%). Twenty-nine (70.7%) of 41 changes in diagnosis involved endometrioid and mucinous tumors. This was attributable to the application of recently revised criteria for distinguishing borderline tumors from carcinomas. None of the originally diagnosed clear cell carcinomas was reclassified as borderline. The distribution of histologic subtypes among the 94 carcinomas included 26 serous (27.7%), 25 clear cell (26.6%), 22 endometrioid (23.4%), 10 mixed (10.6%), 6 mucinous (6.4%), 2 malignant Brenner (2.1%), and 3 adenocarcinomas, not otherwise specified (3.2%). Adjuvant therapy was given to 84 (89.4%) of the 94 patients with carcinomas. The 5-year PFS and DSS were significantly greater for the group of cases that was reclassified as borderline (4.5% vs. 26.2% progressed [P = 0.006]; 4.5% vs. 25.6% died [P = 0.003]). The 5-year PFS and DSS were significantly worse for carcinomas with a TP53 mutation (22.6% vs. 41.2% progressed [P = 0.04]; 21.7% vs. 24.7% died [P = 0.04]). There were no statistically significant differences in outcome between stages I versus II, tumor grades, clear cell histology versus other, and stage IC preoperative versus intraoperative rupture. We concluded that a large number of cases originally diagnosed as early-stage sporadic OC were borderline tumors. Clear cell histology does not confer a worse prognosis compared with other histologies. The presence of a TP53 mutation was an adverse prognostic indicator.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15043303     DOI: 10.1097/00000478-200402000-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol        ISSN: 0147-5185            Impact factor:   6.394


  7 in total

Review 1.  Classification of ovarian carcinomas based on pathology and molecular genetics.

Authors:  Emanuela D'Angelo; Jaime Prat
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.405

2.  Ovarian cancer and DNA repair: DNA ligase IV as a potential key.

Authors:  Joana Assis; Deolinda Pereira; Rui Medeiros
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-02-10

3.  [Specialized histopathological second opinion of advanced ovarian cancer. Experiences with collectives from prospective randomized phase III studies].

Authors:  S Kommoss; J Pfisterer; A du Bois; D Schmidt; F Kommoss
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.011

4.  Agreement for tumor grade of ovarian carcinoma: analysis of archival tissues from the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results residual tissue repository.

Authors:  Rayna K Matsuno; Mark E Sherman; Kala Visvanathan; Marc T Goodman; Brenda Y Hernandez; Charles F Lynch; Olga B Ioffe; David Horio; Charles Platz; Sean F Altekruse; Ruth M Pfeiffer; William F Anderson
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2013-02-03       Impact factor: 2.506

5.  [Central pathology review. Inclusion criterion for clinical studies of ovarian carcinomas?].

Authors:  F Kommoss; S Kommoss; D Schmidt; A du Bois; J Pfisterer
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.011

6.  Clear cell carcinoma of the ovary: a retrospective multicentre experience of 254 patients with complete surgical staging.

Authors:  M Takano; Y Kikuchi; N Yaegashi; K Kuzuya; M Ueki; H Tsuda; M Suzuki; J Kigawa; S Takeuchi; H Tsuda; T Moriya; T Sugiyama
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2006-05-22       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 7.  The Putative Role of TP53 Alterations and p53 Expression in Borderline Ovarian Tumors - Correlation with Clinicopathological Features and Prognosis: A Mini-Review.

Authors:  Andrzej Semczuk; Marek Gogacz; Anna Semczuk-Sikora; Maciej Jóźwik; Tomasz Rechberger
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 4.207

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.