Literature DB >> 15042475

[Measuring preferences of psychiatric patients].

Hans-Helmut König1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Economic evaluation of health care interventions may require preference-based valuations of health outcomes or health effects. This paper provides an overview of the use of standard gamble (SG), time trade-off (TTO) and contingent valuation (CV) to elicit preferences of patients with depression or schizophrenia.
METHODS: A systematic search of the literature was conducted covering the use of SG, TTO and CV in patients with depression or schizophrenia. Practicability, measurement results, construct and concurrent validity as well as test-retest-reliability formed the criteria for reviewing the performance of these measures of preference.
RESULTS: SG, TTO and CV were rarely used in the two diagnostic groups considered. The reviewed studies mostly showed good practicability as well as some evidence for validity and reliability. Measured SG und TTO values point to substantial losses in utility caused by these diseases.
CONCLUSIONS: Elicitation of patient preferences for the economic evaluation of mental health care seems possible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15042475     DOI: 10.1055/s-2003-812598

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychiatr Prax        ISSN: 0303-4259


  4 in total

Review 1.  The estimation of utility weights in cost-utility analysis for mental disorders: a systematic review.

Authors:  Michael Sonntag; Hans-Helmut König; Alexander Konnopka
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Utility assessment in patients with mental disorders: validity and discriminative ability of the time trade-off method.

Authors:  Hans-Helmut König; Oliver H Günther; Matthias C Angermeyer; Christiane Roick
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 3.  What matters to patients? A systematic review of preferences for medication-associated outcomes in mental disorders.

Authors:  Øystein Eiring; Brynjar Fowels Landmark; Endre Aas; Glenn Salkeld; Magne Nylenna; Kari Nytrøen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  What utility scores do mental health service users, healthcare professionals and members of the general public attribute to different health states? A co-produced mixed methods online survey.

Authors:  Chris Flood; Sally Barlow; Alan Simpson; Amanda Burls; Amy Price; Martin Cartwright; Stefano Brini
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.