Literature DB >> 15042401

Ultraviolet properties of Australian mammal urine.

A Kellie1, S J Dain, P B Banks.   

Abstract

The exploitation of predator signals by potential prey is well researched, but relatively little is known about how predators exploit chemical cues (either deliberate signals or waste by-products) produced by their prey. In Finland, the urine of some small rodents ( Microtus spp. and Clethrionomys spp.) is reflective in the ultraviolet range of wavelengths, and diurnal raptors with ultraviolet vision use these urine marks to track their rodent prey. This study examines the potential for such a phenomenon in Australian systems by studying the ultraviolet properties of urine from 13 native and introduced mammal species that are variously preyed upon by raptors. Urine from all 13 species displayed various levels of ultraviolet absorbance in their urine and fluorescence in the ultraviolet range. However, no signs of ultraviolet hyper-reflectance were detected, suggesting that the urine of European voles have unique ultraviolet properties. Ultraviolet-sensitive predators in Australia may be able to distinguish between species based on variation in the ultraviolet absorbance of their urine, but ultraviolet properties did not differ between prey and non-prey species, nor marsupial and placental groups. Moreover, because many natural surfaces are ultraviolet absorbing, it is unlikely that raptors could rely upon the ultraviolet properties of urine to target key prey species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15042401     DOI: 10.1007/s00359-004-0507-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol        ISSN: 0340-7594            Impact factor:   1.836


  9 in total

1.  Sex and age-specific differences in ultraviolet reflectance of scent marks of bank voles (Clethrionomys glareolus).

Authors:  M Koivula; E Koskela; J Viitala
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Retinal receptors in rodents maximally sensitive to ultraviolet light.

Authors:  G H Jacobs; J Neitz; J F Deegan
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1991-10-17       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  A test of a competition model with reference to three species of small mammals in south-eastern Australia.

Authors:  C R Dickman; D P Woodside
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Social rank in house mice: differentiation revealed by ultraviolet visualization of urinary marking patterns.

Authors:  C Desjardins; J A Maruniak; F H Bronson
Journal:  Science       Date:  1973-11-20       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  [Visual range spectrum of Colibri serrirostris].

Authors:  H H Huth
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  1972-12

6.  The influence of ultraviolet radiation on the pigeon's color discrimination.

Authors:  A A Wright
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-05       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Ultraviolet vision in birds: what is its function?

Authors:  A T Bennett; I C Cuthill
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Retinal spectral sensitivity, fur coloration, and urine reflectance in the genus octodon (rodentia): implications for visual ecology.

Authors:  Andrés E Chávez; Francisco Bozinovic; Leo Peichl; Adrián G Palacios
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Olfactory self-selection of protein-containing foods.

Authors:  S C Heinrichs; J A Deutsch; B O Moore
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1990-03
  9 in total
  4 in total

1.  Communication using eye roll reflective signalling.

Authors:  I Novales Flamarique; G A Mueller; C L Cheng; C R Figiel
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Optical properties of the uropygial gland secretion: no evidence for UV cosmetics in birds.

Authors:  Kaspar Delhey; Anne Peters; Peter H W Biedermann; Bart Kempenaers
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2008-06-17

3.  Consumption of grass endophytes alters the ultraviolet spectrum of vole urine.

Authors:  Otso Huitu; Marjo Helander; Päivi Lehtonen; Kari Saikkonen
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  A comparison of scent marking between a monogamous and promiscuous species of peromyscus: pair bonded males do not advertise to novel females.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Becker; Sarah Petruno; Catherine A Marler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.