Literature DB >> 15041616

Intrathecal sufentanil and fetal heart rate abnormalities: a double-blind, double placebo-controlled trial comparing two forms of combined spinal epidural analgesia with epidural analgesia in labor.

M Van de Velde1, A Teunkens, M Hanssens, E Vandermeersch, J Verhaeghe.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Combined spinal epidural analgesia (CSE) for labor pain relief has become increasingly popular. However, the effect of intrathecal sufentanil on the incidence of uterine hyperactivity and fetal heart rate (FHR) abnormalities remains controversial. We hypothesized that the use of intrathecal sufentanil in a dose of 7.5 microg is more likely to induce a nonreassuring FHR tracing than a small dose of spinal sufentanil combined with bupivacaine or epidural analgesia. Three-hundred parturients were randomized into three groups. In the first group, epidural analgesia was initiated with 12.5 mg of bupivacaine, 12.5 microg of epinephrine, and 7.5 microg of sufentanil in a volume of 10 mL (EPD group). In Group 2, initial intrathecal analgesia consisted of 2.5 mg of bupivacaine, 2.5 microg of epinephrine, and 1.5 microg of sufentanil (BSE group); in Group 3, spinal analgesia consisted of 7.5 microg of sufentanil (SUF group). Analgesia was maintained in all groups with patient-controlled epidural analgesia using bupivacaine 0.125%, 1.25 microg/mL of epinephrine, and 0.75 microg/mL of sufentanil (bolus, 4 mL; lockout, 15 min). Cardiotocography was monitored continuously 15 min before analgesia and for 60 min after the start of analgesia. The quality of analgesia, labor, and neonatal outcome and side effects were recorded. Twenty-four percent of patients in the SUF group developed FHR abnormalities (bradycardia or late decelerations) during the first hour after initiation of analgesia compared with 12% in the BSE group and 11% in the EPD group. Uterine hyperactivity occurred in 12% of parturients in the SUF group but in only 2% in the other groups. Onset of analgesia was more rapid in both CSE groups as compared with the EPD group. However, 29% of patients in the BSE group developed severe hypotension, requiring IV ephedrine (29% in the BSE group versus 7% and 12% in the EPD and SUF groups, respectively). All these differences reached statistical significance. The present data corroborate previous recommendations of caution when performing CSE using a large dose (7.5 microg or more) of spinal sufentanil because of the risk of uterine hyperactivity and FHR abnormalities. IMPLICATIONS: Combined spinal epidural analgesia (CSE) produces pain relief during labor. Fetal heart rate changes after CSE using intrathecal sufentanil have been reported. We performed a randomized, blinded trial confirming that fetal heart rate changes are more frequent after CSE using 7.5 micro g of intrathecal sufentanil as compared with other forms of neuraxial labor analgesia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15041616     DOI: 10.1213/01.ane.0000101980.34587.66

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  18 in total

Review 1.  Neuraxial analgesia for labour.

Authors:  B Shatil; R Smiley
Journal:  BJA Educ       Date:  2020-01-27

Review 2.  Combined spinal-epidural versus epidural analgesia in labour.

Authors:  Scott W Simmons; Neda Taghizadeh; Alicia T Dennis; Damien Hughes; Allan M Cyna
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-10-17

3.  Labor Analgesia Onset With Dural Puncture Epidural Versus Traditional Epidural Using a 26-Gauge Whitacre Needle and 0.125% Bupivacaine Bolus: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Sylvia H Wilson; Bethany J Wolf; Kayla Bingham; Quiana S Scotland; John M Fox; Erick M Woltz; Latha Hebbar
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 5.108

Review 4.  A Review of the Impact of Obstetric Anesthesia on Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes.

Authors:  Grace Lim; Francesca L Facco; Naveen Nathan; Jonathan H Waters; Cynthia A Wong; Holger K Eltzschig
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 7.892

5.  Maternal hemodynamics and computerized cardiotocography during labor with epidural analgesia.

Authors:  Stefano Raffaele Giannubilo; Mirco Amici; Simone Pizzi; Alessandro Simonini; Andrea Ciavattini
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 2.344

6.  Factors affecting fetal bradycardia following combined spinal epidural for labor analgesia: a matched case-control study.

Authors:  Su Lin Maureen Cheng; Dianne Bautista; Serene Leo; Tiong Heng Alex Sia
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2012-10-13       Impact factor: 2.078

7.  A randomized trial of breakthrough pain during combined spinal-epidural versus epidural labor analgesia in parous women.

Authors:  Stephanie R Goodman; Richard M Smiley; Maria A Negron; Paula A Freedman; Ruth Landau
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 5.108

8.  Sudden persistent fetal bradycardia after spinal analgesia for labor pain.

Authors:  Yang Hoon Chung; Won Ho Kim; Eun Kyung Lee; Tae Soo Hahm
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2013-12

Review 9.  Side Effects and Efficacy of Neuraxial Opioids in Pregnant Patients at Delivery: A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  Sarah Armstrong; Roshan Fernando
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 5.606

10.  Lower, Variable Intrathecal Opioid Doses, and the Incidence of Prolonged Fetal Heart Rate Decelerations After Combined Spinal Epidural Analgesia for Labor: A Quality Improvement Analysis.

Authors:  Sheena Hembrador; Carlos Delgado; Emily Dinges; Laurent Bollag
Journal:  Rom J Anaesth Intensive Care       Date:  2020-12-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.