Literature DB >> 15040643

Pharmacodynamic effects of zidovudine 600 mg once/day versus 300 mg twice/day in therapy-naïve patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus.

Peter J Ruane1, Gary J Richmond, Edwin DeJesus, Christina E Hill-Zabala, Susan C Danehower, Qiming Liao, Judy Johnson, Mark S Shaefer.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To compare the virologic activity of zidovudine monotherapy administered as 600 mg once/day versus 300 mg twice/day.
DESIGN: Phase II, randomized (1:1), open-label study.
SETTING: Thirteen medical centers in the United States. PATIENTS: Thirty-two antiretroviral-naive patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). INTERVENTION: Patients were administered either zidovudine 600 mg every 24 hours (16 patients) or 300 mg every 12 hours (16 patients) for 13 days.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Plasma HIV-1 RNA concentration was measured daily. Study end points were between-group differences in change from baseline of log10-transformed HIV-1 RNA and in rates of viral load decline measured by the slope of HIV-1 RNA over time. At baseline, mean HIV-1 RNA was similar in the once/day and twice/day groups (4.33 and 4.40 log10 copies/ml, respectively). At day 14, a trend toward lower mean reduction in HIV-1 RNA from baseline was observed in the once/day group (-0.585, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.728 to -0.442 log10 copies/ml) compared with the twice/day group (-0.849, 95% CI -1.067 to -0.630 log10 copies/ml, p=0.056). Viral load reduction also tended to be slower in the once/day group, as indicated by the smaller slope of viral load decline in the once/day group than in the twice/day group during days 1-14 (-0.045 vs -0.065 logic copies/ml/day, p=0.065). Both zidovudine regimens were similarly well tolerated.
CONCLUSION: Zidovudine 600 mg once/day has antiviral activity, although less pronounced and more slowly achieved than that seen with zidovudine 300 mg twice/day. No differences were observed between the two treatment groups with respect to safety profile or tolerability

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15040643     DOI: 10.1592/phco.24.4.307.33184

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacotherapy        ISSN: 0277-0008            Impact factor:   4.705


  5 in total

1.  Initial viral decay to assess the relative antiretroviral potency of protease inhibitor-sparing, nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-sparing, and nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-sparing regimens for first-line therapy of HIV infection.

Authors:  Richard H Haubrich; Sharon A Riddler; Heather Ribaudo; Gregory Direnzo; Karin L Klingman; Kevin W Garren; David L Butcher; James F Rooney; Diane V Havlir; John W Mellors
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2011-11-28       Impact factor: 4.177

2.  Zidovudine and Lamivudine for HIV Infection.

Authors:  Peter L Anderson; Joseph E Rower
Journal:  Clin Med Rev Ther       Date:  2010

3.  Intracellular pharmacokinetics of once versus twice daily zidovudine and lamivudine in adolescents.

Authors:  Patricia M Flynn; John Rodman; Jane C Lindsey; Brian Robbins; Edmund Capparelli; Katherine M Knapp; Jose F Rodriguez; James McNamara; Leslie Serchuck; Barbara Heckman; Jaime Martinez
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2007-07-30       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Development of an optimized dose for coformulation of zidovudine with drugs that select for the K65R mutation using a population pharmacokinetic and enzyme kinetic simulation model.

Authors:  Selwyn J Hurwitz; Ghazia Asif; Nancy M Kivel; Raymond F Schinazi
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2008-10-06       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Comparative study of antiretroviral drug regimens and drug-drug interactions between younger and older HIV-infected patients at a tertiary care teaching hospital in South Korea.

Authors:  Mi Seon Park; Young-Mo Yang; Ju-Sin Kim; Eun Joo Choi
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 2.423

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.