Literature DB >> 1503935

Poor prognosis neuroblastoma: is screening the answer?

A W Craft1, L Parker.   

Abstract

Neuroblastoma is one of the most common solid tumours of childhood and is unique amongst paediatric cancers in that it results in the urinary excretion of catecholamine metabolites which are easily measured in spot urine samples and so is a condition for which screening may be considered. The continuing poor prognosis associated with late stage disease has stimulated great interest in this proposition. The Japanese have been undertaking pioneering studies of such screening since 1974 and since 1985, all 6 months old babies have been offered screening. Preliminary data would appear to suggest that screening is effective in greatly improving the survival of children with neuroblastoma. However there are difficulties associated with the interpretation of survival data since screening undoubtedly results in the detection of cases which would otherwise have remained 'silent', and the well known problems of lead-time and length-time bias complicate matters still further. The time is not yet ready for universal implementation of screening and further investigation is required.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1503935      PMCID: PMC2149668     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer Suppl        ISSN: 0306-9443


  31 in total

1.  Consistent N-myc copy number in simultaneous or consecutive neuroblastoma samples from sixty individual patients.

Authors:  G M Brodeur; F A Hayes; A A Green; J T Casper; J Wasson; S Wallach; R C Seeger
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1987-08-15       Impact factor: 12.701

2.  Flow cytometric DNA analysis of neuroblastoma. Correlation with histology and clinical outcome.

Authors:  T Gansler; J Chatten; M Varello; G R Bunin; B Atkinson
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1986-12-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 3.  Do children benefit from mass screening for neuroblastoma? Consensus Statement from the American Cancer Society Workshop on Neuroblastoma Screening.

Authors:  S B Murphy; S L Cohn; A W Craft; W G Woods; T Sawada; R P Castleberry; H L Levy; P C Prorok; G D Hammond
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1991-02-09       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  A proposed staging for children with neuroblastoma. Children's cancer study group A.

Authors:  A E Evans; G J D'Angio; J Randolph
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1971-02       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Simple liquid-chromatographic measurement of vanillylmandelic acid and homovanillic acid in urine on filter paper for mass screening of neuroblastoma in infants.

Authors:  J Hanai; T Kawai; Y Sato; N Takasugi; M Nishi; T Takeda
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 8.327

6.  Prognostic factor in neuroblastoma.

Authors:  A E Evans; G J D'Angio; K Propert; J Anderson; H W Hann
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1987-06-01       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Feasibility study for neonatal neuroblastoma screening in the United States.

Authors:  M Tuchman; E J Fisher; M A Heisel; W G Woods
Journal:  Med Pediatr Oncol       Date:  1989

8.  Newborn urine screening experience with over one million infants in the Quebec Network of Genetic Medicine.

Authors:  B Lemieux; C Auray-Blais; R Giguère; D Shapcott; C R Scriver
Journal:  J Inherit Metab Dis       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 4.982

9.  Biochemical screening for neuroblastoma in infants: a feasibility study.

Authors:  A W Craft; G Dale; A McGill; J Seviour; E M Spence
Journal:  Med Pediatr Oncol       Date:  1989

10.  The Northern region Children's malignant disease registry 1968-82: incidence and survival.

Authors:  A W Craft; H A Amineddine; J E Scott; J Wagget
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  1 in total

1.  Cancer stem cells in neuroblastoma therapy resistance.

Authors:  Natarajan Aravindan; Drishti Jain; Dinesh Babu Somasundaram; Terence S Herman; Sheeja Aravindan
Journal:  Cancer Drug Resist       Date:  2019-11-11
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.