Literature DB >> 15038796

Academic consumer researchers: a bridge between consumers and researchers.

Kathleen M Griffiths1, Anthony F Jorm, Helen Christensen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the contributions that consumers, and academic consumer researchers in particular, can make to mental health research.
METHOD: A literature survey and a systematic consideration of the potential advantages of consumer and academic consumer researcher involvement in health research.
RESULTS: Consumer researchers may contribute to better health outcomes, but there are significant barriers to their participation in the research process. To date, discussion has focused on the role of nonacademic consumers in the health research process. There has been little recognition of the particular contributions that consumers with formal academic qualifications and research experience can offer. Academic consumer researchers (ACRs) offer many of the advantages associated with lay consumer participation, as well as some unique advantages. These advantages include acceptance by other researchers as equal partners in the research process; skills in research; access to research funding; training in disseminating research findings within the scientific community; potential to influence research funding and research policy; capacity to influence the research culture; and potential to facilitate the involvement of lay consumers in the research process. In recognition of the value of a critical mass of ACRs in mental health, a new ACR unit (the Depression and Anxiety Consumer Research Unit [CRU]) has been established at the Centre for Mental Health Research at the Australian National University.
CONCLUSIONS: Academic consumer researchers have the potential to increase the relevance of mental health research to consumers, to bridge the gap between the academic and consumer communities and to contribute to the process of destigmatizing mental disorders.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15038796     DOI: 10.1080/j.1440-1614.2004.01337.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust N Z J Psychiatry        ISSN: 0004-8674            Impact factor:   5.744


  3 in total

1.  Patient and public involvement in patient-reported outcome measures: evolution not revolution.

Authors:  Sophie Staniszewska; Kirstie L Haywood; Jo Brett; Liz Tutton
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 3.883

Review 2.  Mapping the impact of patient and public involvement on health and social care research: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jo Brett; Sophie Staniszewska; Carole Mockford; Sandra Herron-Marx; John Hughes; Colin Tysall; Rashida Suleman
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  Wise owls and professors: the role of older researchers in the review of the National Service Framework for Older People.

Authors:  Michelle Cornes; John Peardon; Jill Manthorpe
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.377

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.