Literature DB >> 15036847

On the use of margins for geometrical uncertainties around the rectum in radiotherapy planning.

Ludvig Paul Muren1, Randi Ekerold, Yngve Kvinnsland, Asa Karlsdottir, Olav Dahl.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: To derive planning organ at risk volume (PRV) margins for the rectum and to analyse the impact of such margins on rectum dose volume histograms (DVHs). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Weekly repeat computer tomography (CT) scans of 19 bladder cancer patients acquired during a conformal radiotherapy course were registered with the corresponding planning CT scans. From these scans, the internal rectal motion was quantified, and the margins that had to be added to the rectum contour in the planning scan to encompass the observed span of rectum motion were determined. These margins were compared to the margins derived using a recent PRV margin recipe. To illustrate the impact of margins on rectum DVHs, the margins were applied in treatment plans of six prostate cancer patients.
RESULTS: Altogether 141 CT scans were analysed. On average 24% of the repeat scan rectum volume was displaced outside the planning scan contours, and wall movements of up to 30 mm were observed. Margins of 16 mm anterior and 11 mm posterior encompassed all rectal motion except for the two most displaced rectum walls in each of these directions, in 89% of the patients. Using a recently published statistics-based recipe, margins of 6 mm anterior and 5 mm posterior accounted for the systematic rectum variation, i.e. the average wall position, in 90% of the patients. Adding anterior margin only caused consistent increases (up to 20%) in the fraction of the volume inside the high-dose region (40-70 Gy) compared to the DVH of rectum only. When using both anterior and posterior margins only small shifts (<5%) in the volume fractions were observed.
CONCLUSIONS: Rectum PRV margins of 5-6 mm will encompass the systematic component of rectum motion, while margins up to 16 mm are required to also account for most of the random variation. Use of anterior margins only caused large shifts in the DVHs in the clinically significant dose range, while only minor shifts were seen when using both anterior and posterior margins.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15036847     DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2003.11.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiother Oncol        ISSN: 0167-8140            Impact factor:   6.280


  4 in total

Review 1.  Image-guided radiation therapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Juliette Thariat; Shafak Aluwini; Qiong Pan; Mickael Caullery; Pierre-Yves Marcy; Martin Housset; Jean-Leon Lagrange
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  Normal Tissue Complication Probability (NTCP) modeling of late rectal bleeding following external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer: A Test of the QUANTEC-recommended NTCP model.

Authors:  Mitchell Liu; Vitali Moiseenko; Alexander Agranovich; Anand Karvat; Winkle Kwan; Ziad H Saleh; Aditya A Apte; Joseph O Deasy
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.089

3.  Statistical simulations to estimate motion-inclusive dose-volume histograms for prediction of rectal morbidity following radiotherapy.

Authors:  Maria Thor; Aditya Apte; Joseph O Deasy; Ludvig Paul Muren
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2012-12-04       Impact factor: 4.089

4.  Dosimetric impact of intra-fraction prostate motion under a tumour-tracking system in hypofractionated robotic radiosurgery.

Authors:  Yuhei Koike; Iori Sumida; Hirokazu Mizuno; Hiroya Shiomi; Keita Kurosu; Seiichi Ota; Yasuo Yoshioka; Osamu Suzuki; Keisuke Tamari; Kazuhiko Ogawa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.