Literature DB >> 15036842

Control strategies for sweet potato virus disease in Africa.

Richard W Gibson1, Valentine Aritua, Emmanuel Byamukama, Isaac Mpembe, James Kayongo.   

Abstract

Sweet potato virus disease (SPVD), caused by dual infection with the whitefly-borne Sweet potato chlorotic stunt virus (SPCSV) and the aphid-borne Sweet potato feathery mottle virus (SPFMV), is the most serious disease of sweet potato in Africa. SPVD has been known there since at least the 1940s, although it took several decades to elucidate its aetiology. It occurs throughout Africa and is particularly prevalent in the Great Lakes region. Production of sweet potato is largely by resource-poor farmers, growing mostly local landraces and for home consumption and so control strategies need to be appropriate to these circumstances. Most high yielding and/or early maturing landraces in Uganda are susceptible to SPVD and most resistant landraces are low-yielding, forcing farmers to compromise between the conflicting requirements of large and/or early yields, and food security. Accordingly, two strategies were tested to avoid the disadvantages associated with such compromises. These were deploying high-yielding SPVD-resistant cultivars and phytosanitation practices to enable susceptible landraces to be grown successfully. In on-farm trials in Masaka and Rakai Districts of Uganda, some SPVD-resistant cultivars bred at Namulonge Agricultural and Animal Research Station (NAARI), in Wakiso District, out-yielded local landraces. Other trials at NAARI and at nearby farms showed that roguing diseased cuttings within 1 month of planting and isolation from diseased crops, even by as little as 15m, can considerably decrease spread of SPVD to susceptible cultivars. This indicates that phytosanitation can protect desirable susceptible cultivars, even if adopted only locally. A dual approach of deploying both resistant varieties and phytosanitation provides farmers with a valuable increase in their choice of control strategies for SPVD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15036842     DOI: 10.1016/j.virusres.2003.12.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Virus Res        ISSN: 0168-1702            Impact factor:   3.303


  10 in total

1.  Development of transgenic sweet potato with multiple virus resistance in South Africa (SA).

Authors:  B J Sivparsad; A Gubba
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 2.788

2.  Disease control and its selection for damaging plant virus strains in vegetatively propagated staple food crops; a theoretical assessment.

Authors:  F van den Bosch; M J Jeger; C A Gilligan
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  P1 of Sweet Potato Feathery Mottle Virus Shows Strong Adaptation Capacity, Replacing P1-HCPro in a Chimeric Plum Pox Virus.

Authors:  B Rodamilans; A Casillas; J A García
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 5.103

4.  Sweepoviruses cause disease in sweet potato and related Ipomoea spp.: fulfilling Koch's postulates for a divergent group in the genus begomovirus.

Authors:  Helena P Trenado; Anelise F Orílio; Belén Márquez-Martín; Enrique Moriones; Jesús Navas-Castillo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  A novel sweet potato potyvirus open reading frame (ORF) is expressed via polymerase slippage and suppresses RNA silencing.

Authors:  Milton Untiveros; Allan Olspert; Katrin Artola; Andrew E Firth; Jan F Kreuze; Jari P T Valkonen
Journal:  Mol Plant Pathol       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 5.663

6.  Efficiency of insect-proof net tunnels in reducing virus-related seed degeneration in sweet potato.

Authors:  K O Ogero; J F Kreuze; M A McEwan; N D Luambano; H Bachwenkizi; K A Garrett; K F Andersen; S Thomas-Sharma; R A A van der Vlugt
Journal:  Plant Pathol       Date:  2019-07-22       Impact factor: 2.590

7.  Targeting of SPCSV-RNase3 via CRISPR-Cas13 confers resistance against sweet potato virus disease.

Authors:  Yicheng Yu; Zhiyuan Pan; Xiao Wang; Xiaofeng Bian; Weichi Wang; Qiang Liang; Meng Kou; Hongtao Ji; Yanjuan Li; Daifu Ma; Zongyun Li; Jian Sun
Journal:  Mol Plant Pathol       Date:  2021-10-11       Impact factor: 5.663

8.  Cost-effective control of plant disease when epidemiological knowledge is incomplete: modelling Bahia bark scaling of citrus.

Authors:  Nik J Cunniffe; Francisco F Laranjeira; Franco M Neri; R Erik DeSimone; Christopher A Gilligan
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  An atypical RNA silencing suppression strategy provides a snapshot of the evolution of sweet potato-infecting potyviruses.

Authors:  Bernardo Rodamilans; Adrián Valli; Ares Mingot; David San León; Juan José López-Moya; Juan Antonio García
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Conservation of vegetable genetic diversity in Transylvania-Romania.

Authors:  Aurel Maxim; Silvia Străjeru; Cristian Albu; Mignon Sandor; Lucia Mihalescu; Sînziana Ecaterina Pauliuc
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.