Literature DB >> 15036066

Potentials evoked by chirp-modulated tones: a new technique to evaluate oscillatory activity in the auditory pathway.

J Artieda1, M Valencia, M Alegre, O Olaziregi, E Urrestarazu, J Iriarte.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Steady-state potentials are oscillatory responses generated by a rhythmic stimulation of a sensory pathway. The frequency of the response, which follows the frequency of stimulation, is maximal at a stimulus rate of 40 Hz for auditory stimuli. The exact cause of these maximal responses is not known, although some authors have suggested that they might be related to the 'working frequency' of the auditory cortex. Testing of the responses to different frequencies of stimulation may be lengthy if a single frequency is studied at a time. Our aim was to develop a fast technique to explore the oscillatory response to auditory stimuli, using a tone modulated in amplitude by a sinusoid whose frequency increases linearly in frequency ('chirp') from 1 to 120 Hz.
METHODS: Time-frequency transforms were used for the analysis of the evoked responses in 10 subjects. Also, we analyzed whether the peaks in these responses were due to increases of amplitude or to phase-locking phenomena, using single-sweep time-frequency transforms and inter-trial phase analysis.
RESULTS: The pattern observed in the time-frequency transform of the chirp-evoked potential was very similar in all subjects: a diagonal band of energy was observed, corresponding to the frequency of modulation at each time instant. Two components were present in the band, one around 45 Hz (30-60 Hz) and a smaller one between 80 and 120 Hz. Inter-trial phase analysis showed that these components were mainly due to phase locking phenomena.
CONCLUSIONS: A simultaneous testing of the amplitude-modulation-following oscillatory responses to auditory stimulation is feasible using a tone modulated in amplitude at increasing frequencies. The maximal energies found at stimulation frequencies around 40 Hz are probably due to increased phase-locking of the individual responses.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15036066     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2003.10.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 1388-2457            Impact factor:   3.708


  20 in total

1.  Modulation of steady-state auditory evoked potentials by cerebellar rTMS.

Authors:  Maria A Pastor; Gregor Thut; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-07-07       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  A novel EEG paradigm to simultaneously and rapidly assess the functioning of auditory and visual pathways.

Authors:  Kristina C Backer; Andrew S Kessler; Laurel A Lawyer; David P Corina; Lee M Miller
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Deletion of Fmr1 from Forebrain Excitatory Neurons Triggers Abnormal Cellular, EEG, and Behavioral Phenotypes in the Auditory Cortex of a Mouse Model of Fragile X Syndrome.

Authors:  Jonathan W Lovelace; Maham Rais; Arnold R Palacios; Xinghao S Shuai; Steven Bishay; Otilia Popa; Patricia S Pirbhoy; Devin K Binder; David L Nelson; Iryna M Ethell; Khaleel A Razak
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2020-03-14       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  Static magnetic stimulation of human auditory cortex: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Gurutzi Azcona Ganuza; Manuel Alegre
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 1.703

5.  Auditory responses and stimulus-specific adaptation in rat auditory cortex are preserved across NREM and REM sleep.

Authors:  Yuval Nir; Vladyslav V Vyazovskiy; Chiara Cirelli; Matthew I Banks; Giulio Tononi
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2013-12-08       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Acute pharmacological inhibition of matrix metalloproteinase-9 activity during development restores perineuronal net formation and normalizes auditory processing in Fmr1 KO mice.

Authors:  Patricia S Pirbhoy; Maham Rais; Jonathan W Lovelace; Walker Woodard; Khaleel A Razak; Devin K Binder; Iryna M Ethell
Journal:  J Neurochem       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 5.372

7.  The PDE10A Inhibitor TAK-063 Reverses Sound-Evoked EEG Abnormalities in a Mouse Model of Fragile X Syndrome.

Authors:  Carrie R Jonak; Manbir S Sandhu; Samantha A Assad; Jacqueline A Barbosa; Mahindra Makhija; Devin K Binder
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 7.620

8.  Chirp Analyzer for Estimating Amplitude and Latency of Steady-State Auditory Envelope Following Responses.

Authors:  Eduardo Martinez-Montes; Yalina Garcia-Puente; Matias Zanartu; Pavel Prado-Gutierrez
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 3.802

9.  Multielectrode array analysis of EEG biomarkers in a mouse model of Fragile X Syndrome.

Authors:  Carrie R Jonak; Jonathan W Lovelace; Iryna M Ethell; Khaleel A Razak; Devin K Binder
Journal:  Neurobiol Dis       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 7.046

10.  Individual Resonant Frequencies at Low-Gamma Range and Cognitive Processing Speed.

Authors:  Vykinta Parciauskaite; Evaldas Pipinis; Aleksandras Voicikas; Jovana Bjekic; Mindaugas Potapovas; Vytautas Jurkuvenas; Inga Griskova-Bulanova
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2021-05-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.