Literature DB >> 15036047

Contribution of different EEG frequencies to auditory evoked potential abnormalities in schizophrenia.

Ben H Jansen1, Anant Hegde, Nashaat N Boutros.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We have shown previously [Clin Neurophysiol 2003;114:79] that phase reorganization of the ongoing electroencephalogram (EEG) plays an important role in the generation of auditory evoked potential (EP) components with a latency between 50 and 200 ms. In the present study, we investigate whether schizophrenia patients suffer from phase synchronization deficits as compared to normal subjects.
METHODS: The auditory EPs from 20 normal subjects and 19 schizophrenia patients were analyzed. EPs were obtained using a double stimulus paradigm, in which two identical tone bursts (S1 and S2) were delivered with an average inter-stimulus interval of 500 ms and an inter-pair interval of 8 s. The Piecewise Prony Method (PPM) was used to decompose single trial auditory evoked potentials into different frequency bands. Pre- and post-stimulus phase histograms were compared for each frequency band to determine the degree of phase synchronization produced by auditory stimulation in the two populations.
RESULTS: The S1 stimulus produced significantly less (P < 0.05) phase synchronization in schizophrenia patients than in normal subjects in the 2-12 Hz frequency range. Far fewer and smaller inter-population phase synchronization differences were seen for the S2 stimulus. Both populations showed more phase synchronization for S1 than S2. A significant correlation (P < 0.01) between N100 amplitude and phase synchronization 100 ms post S1 was observed for the normal population but not for the schizophrenia group. The correlation between P200 amplitude and phase synchronization 200 ms post S1 was significant for the normal group (P < 0.01) and the schizophrenia group (P < 0.03).
CONCLUSIONS: Schizophrenia patients have a phase synchronization deficiency, as compared to a normal control group, especially for the first stimulus, in the 2-12 Hz frequency range. This deficiency explains the lower EP amplitudes and may be a significant factor contributing to reduced sensory gating reported in schizophrenic subjects. SIGNIFICANCE: The research presented here contributes to the understanding of the mechanism underlying sensory gating in health and gating deficiencies in schizophrenia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15036047     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2003.10.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 1388-2457            Impact factor:   3.708


  23 in total

1.  Event-related potentials and changes of brain rhythm oscillations during working memory activation in patients with first-episode psychosis.

Authors:  Pascal Missonnier; François R Herrmann; Adriano Zanello; Maryse Badan Bâ; Logos Curtis; Diana Canovas; Fabrice Chantraine; Jonas Richiardi; Panteleimon Giannakopoulos; Marco C G Merlo
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 6.186

2.  Distinct neural generators of sensory gating in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Terrance J Williams; Keith H Nuechterlein; Kenneth L Subotnik; Cindy M Yee
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2010-08-23       Impact factor: 4.016

3.  Frontal slow-wave activity as a predictor of negative symptoms, cognition and functional capacity in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Yu-Han Chen; Breannan Stone-Howell; J Christopher Edgar; Mingxiong Huang; Cassandra Wootton; Michael A Hunter; Brett Y Lu; Joseph R Sadek; Gregory A Miller; José M Cañive
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 9.319

4.  Preliminary evidence for reduced auditory lateral suppression in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Erin M Ramage; David M Weintraub; Sally J Vogel; Griffin P Sutton; Erik N Ringdahl; Daniel N Allen; Joel S Snyder
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2015-01-10       Impact factor: 4.939

5.  Auditory evoked potential variability in healthy and schizophrenia subjects.

Authors:  Ben H Jansen; Lingli Hu; Nash N Boutros
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-04-02       Impact factor: 3.708

6.  Sensory gating disturbances in the spectrum: similarities and differences in schizotypal personality disorder and schizophrenia.

Authors:  Erin A Hazlett; Ethan G Rothstein; Rui Ferreira; Jeremy M Silverman; Larry J Siever; Ann Olincy
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 4.939

7.  Superior temporal gyrus spectral abnormalities in schizophrenia.

Authors:  J Christopher Edgar; Faith M Hanlon; Ming-Xiong Huang; Michael P Weisend; Robert J Thoma; Bruce Carpenter; Karsten Hoechstetter; José M Cañive; Gregory A Miller
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2008-07-24       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 8.  The role of oscillations and synchrony in cortical networks and their putative relevance for the pathophysiology of schizophrenia.

Authors:  Peter J Uhlhaas; Corinna Haenschel; Danko Nikolić; Wolf Singer
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2008-06-17       Impact factor: 9.306

9.  P50, N100, and P200 sensory gating: relationships with behavioral inhibition, attention, and working memory.

Authors:  Marijn Lijffijt; Scott D Lane; Stacey L Meier; Nash N Boutros; Scott Burroughs; Joel L Steinberg; F Gerard Moeller; Alan C Swann
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2009-06-08       Impact factor: 4.016

10.  Sensory gating endophenotype based on its neural oscillatory pattern and heritability estimate.

Authors:  L Elliot Hong; Ann Summerfelt; Braxton D Mitchell; Robert P McMahon; Ikwunga Wonodi; Robert W Buchanan; Gunvant K Thaker
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2008-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.