Literature DB >> 15035588

Delineating and quantifying ground water discharge zones using streambed temperatures.

Brewster Conant1.   

Abstract

Streambed temperature mapping, hydraulic testing using minipiezometers, and geochemical analyses of interstitial water of the streambed were used to delineate the pattern of ground water discharge in a sandy streambed and to develop a flux-based conceptual model for ground water/surface water interactions. A new and simple empirical method was used to relate fluxes obtained from minipiezometer data to streambed temperatures. The relationship allowed flux to be calculated at locations where only streambed temperature measurements were made. Slug testing and potentiomanometer measurements at 34 piezometers indicated ground water discharge ranged from 0.03 to 446 L/m2/day (and possibly as high as 7060 L/m2/day) along a 60 m long by 11 to 14 m wide reach of river. Complex but similar plan-view patterns of flux were calculated for both summer and winter using hundreds of streambed temperatures measured on a 1 by 2 m grid. The reach was dominated by ground water discharge and 5% to 7% of the area accounted for approximately 20% to 24% of the total discharge. < 12% of the total area consisted of recharge zones or no-discharge zones. A conceptual model for ground water/surface water interactions consisting of five different behaviors was developed based on the magnitude and direction of flux across the surface of the streambed. The behaviors include short-circuit discharge (e.g., high-flow springs), high discharge (e.g., preferential flowpaths), low to moderate discharge, no discharge (e.g., horizontal hyporheic or ground water flow), and recharge. Geological variations at depth played a key role in determining which type of flow behavior occurred in the streambed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15035588     DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6584.2004.tb02671.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ground Water        ISSN: 0017-467X            Impact factor:   2.671


  4 in total

Review 1.  Factors influencing streambed hydraulic conductivity and their implications on stream-aquifer interaction: a conceptual review.

Authors:  Sujay Raghavendra Naganna; Paresh Chandra Deka; Sudheer Ch; William F Hansen
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-10-07       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Evaluation of the impacts of mine drainage from a coal waste pile on the surrounding environment at Smolnica, southern Poland.

Authors:  Ondra Sracek; Grzegorz Gzyl; Adam Frolik; Janusz Kubica; Zbigniew Bzowski; Michal Gwoździewicz; Karol Kura
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2009-05-09       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Comparing biotic drivers of litter breakdown across stream compartments.

Authors:  Ignacio Peralta-Maraver; Daniel M Perkins; Murray S A Thompson; Katarina Fussmann; Julia Reiss; Anne L Robertson
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2019-05-17       Impact factor: 5.091

4.  Spreadsheet Tools for Quantifying Seepage Flux Across the GW-SW Interface.

Authors:  R G Ford; B K Lien; S D Acree; R R Ross
Journal:  Water Resour Res       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 5.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.