Literature DB >> 15035275

Stereotactic radiosurgery for brainstem arteriovenous malformations: factors affecting outcome.

Keisuke Maruyama1, Douglas Kondziolka, Ajay Niranjan, John C Flickinger, L Dade Lunsford.   

Abstract

OBJECT: Management options for arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) of the brainstem are limited. The long-term results of stereotactic radiosurgery for these disease entities are poorly understood. In this report the authors reviewed both neurological and radiological outcomes following stereotactic radiosurgery for brainstem AVMs over 15 years of experience.
METHODS: Fifty patients with brainstem AVMs underwent gamma knife surgery between 1987 and 2002. There were 29 male and 21 female patients with an age range of 7 to 79 years (median 35 years). Anatomical locations of these AVMs included the midbrain (39 lesions), pons (20 lesions), and medulla oblongata (three lesions). The radiation dose applied to the margin of the AVM varied from 12 to 26 Gy (median 20 Gy). Forty-five patients were followed up from 5 to 176 months (mean 72 months). The angiographically confirmed actuarial obliteration rate was 66% at the final follow-up examination. Two patients experienced a hemorrhage before obliteration. The annual hemorrhage rate was 1.7% for the first 3 years after radiosurgery and 0% thereafter. Patients who had received irradiation at two or fewer isocenters had higher obliteration rates (80% compared with 44% for > two isocenters, p = 0.006), and this was related to a more spherical nidus shape. The rate of persistent neurological complications in patients treated using magnetic resonance imaging-based dose planning after 1993 was 7%, compared with 20% in patients treated before 1993. An older patient age, a lesion located in the tectum, and a higher radiosurgery-based score were significantly associated with greater neurological complications.
CONCLUSIONS: Stereotactic radiosurgery provided complete obliteration of AVMs in two thirds of the patients with a low risk of latency-interval hemorrhage. Better three-dimensional imaging studies and conformal dose planning reduced the risk of adverse radiation effects. Younger patients harboring more spherical AVMs that did not involve the tectal plate had the best outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15035275     DOI: 10.3171/jns.2004.100.3.0407

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  22 in total

Review 1.  MR imaging of midbrain pathologies.

Authors:  E Hattingen; S Blasel; M Nichtweiss; F E Zanella; S Weidauer
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 3.649

Review 2.  Radiation associated brainstem injury.

Authors:  Charles Mayo; Ellen Yorke; Thomas E Merchant
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  A challenging entity of endovascular embolization with ONYX for brainstem arteriovenous malformation: Experience from 13 cases.

Authors:  Hengwei Jin; Zhan Liu; Qing Chang; Chang Chen; Huijian Ge; Xianli Lv; Youxiang Li
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 1.610

Review 4.  Management of ruptured brain arteriovenous malformations.

Authors:  Brad E Zacharia; Kerry A Vaughan; Adam Jacoby; Zachary L Hickman; Daniel Bodmer; E Sander Connolly
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 5.113

5.  Estimating normal tissue toxicity in radiosurgery of the CNS: application and limitations of QUANTEC.

Authors:  John P Kirkpatrick; Lawrence B Marks; Charles S Mayo; Yaacov R Lawrence; Niranjan Bhandare; Samuel Ryu
Journal:  J Radiosurg SBRT       Date:  2011

Review 6.  Modern radiosurgical and endovascular classification schemes for brain arteriovenous malformations.

Authors:  Ali Tayebi Meybodi; Michael T Lawton
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 3.042

7.  Posterior fossa brain arteriovenous malformations : Clinical features and outcomes of endovascular embolization, adjuvant microsurgery and radiosurgery.

Authors:  Ling-Feng Lai; Jia-Xiang Chen; Kuang Zheng; Xu-Ying He; Xi-Feng Li; Xin Zhang; Qiu-Jing Wang; Chuan-Zhi Duan; Min Chen
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 3.649

8.  Neurovascular radiosurgery.

Authors:  M Söderman; W Y Guo; B Karlsson; D M Pelz; E Ulfarsson; T Andersson
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2006-12-13       Impact factor: 1.610

9.  Linear accelerator-based stereotactic radiosurgery for brainstem metastases: the Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center experience.

Authors:  Paul J Kelly; Yijie Brittany Lin; Alvin Y C Yu; Alexander E Ropper; Paul L Nguyen; Karen J Marcus; Fred L Hacker; Stephanie E Weiss
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2011-01-07       Impact factor: 4.130

10.  Radiosurgical considerations in the treatment of large cerebral arteriovenous malformations.

Authors:  Sung Ho Lee; Young Jin Lim; Seok Keun Choi; Tae Sung Kim; Bong Arm Rhee
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2009-10-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.